Procedures for Handling Inmates Refusing to Enter Their Cells Post-Lights Out

Introduction: The night shift in correctional facilities can be particularly challenging, especially when inmates refuse to comply with the standard procedures after lights out. This article explains the typical protocol and the consequences that follow such refusals, highlighting the measures taken by correctional officers and the potential impacts on the inmate's behavior and well-being.

Refusal to Enter the Cell

When an inmate refuses to enter their cell after the lights have gone out, this is often referred to as 'locking up.' The refusal can be a sign of resistance, defiance, or even a strategic move to avoid confinement. While initial attempts may be made to persuade the inmate, persistent non-compliance can lead to serious consequences.

Initial Attempts to Resolve

Cases of inmates refusing to go to their cells post-lights out are usually handled through a series of warnings. Typically, officers give multiple chances for the inmate to comply with the order. However, if the inmate continues to refuse, as often as twice, a more forceful approach may be initiated.

Consequences and Confrontation

Upon repeated refusal, correctional officers may confront the inmate, often with a minimum of three warnings. At this point, the officers might try to persuade the inmate through words alone, but if the inmate remains unyielding, the situation escalates. Depending on the situation, officers can involve additional staff to ensure compliance. This intervention can lead to the use of force if necessary, as the officers are duty-bound to maintain order in the facility.

If the inmate is unable to be persuaded and continues to refuse to go to their cell, they are often required to undergo a 'trip to 24-hour lock up' or in some cases, '23-hour lock up' such as in some counties. Refusal can also result in a formal misconduct charge, which can lead to the inmate being placed in segregation.

Segregation and Further Consequences

Once placed in segregation, the inmate could face additional coercive measures aimed at breaking their will. Officers may attempt to flip the inmate and make them confess to any wrongdoings or provide information on other inmates. Threats are often employed, and the inmate might be repeatedly moved between cells to prevent them from adjusting to their new environment. The aim is to isolate the inmate psychologically and physically, making it harder for them to maintain their defiance.

Attitudinal Change

In some cases, the aggressive tactics used by the correctional staff can lead to an attitudinal change in the inmate. The stress and discomfort of segregation, combined with the fear of further punishment, can cause the inmate to submit. This may result in the inmate being willing to discuss their behavior and solve any underlying issues that led to the refusal in the first place. However, it's important to note that the process of using force and segregation is not always successful and can be met with significant resistance.

Escaping Debt or Avoiding Consequences

Some inmates engage in a practice known as 'locking up' as a strategy to escape from the financial burden they face while in prison. This includes avoiding paying debts to store managers, gambling debts, or drug dealers, among others. In such cases, the inmate might be labeled as a 'lock up artist,' and while this tactic may provide temporary relief from financial obligations, it often leads to further complications and frequently results in the inmate's eventual capture.

Health and Physical Well-Being

It's worth noting that the process of being forcibly placed in a cell and subsequently removed due to refusal can lead to health consequences. Injuries and psychological stress are common among inmates who experience force during these situations. Additionally, the stress of prolonged segregation can have a significant impact on an inmate's mental health and well-being.

Conclusion

The handling of an inmate's refusal to enter their cell post-lights out is a critical aspect of maintaining order in correctional facilities. While correctional officers are trained to handle these situations with care and adherence to protocol, the process can be fraught with challenges. The methods employed, such as warnings, confrontations, and segregation, aim to address the behavior while considering the health and well-being of the inmates.