Why Did Netflix Spend $100 Million on Meghan and Harry Documentaries?

Netflix's reported $100 million investment in documentaries featuring Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has been a source of controversy and discussion. Many critics argue that this substantial sum was unwarranted and potentially ill-conceived. This article aims to dissect the factors behind this monumental expenditure and analyze the underlying motivations.

Ignorance, Stupidity, and Greed

The decision to invest such a large sum can be summarized in three key words: ignorance, stupidity, and greed. Let's explore these aspects in detail.

Ignorance

The first factor is ignorance. Netflix’s board, which is predominantly leftist, may have overlooked crucial information about Meghan and Harry's suitability for the role. Had they conducted thorough research, they would have discovered that both individuals lacked the necessary experience to produce high-quality content. This oversight suggests a lack of due diligence and a failure to assess the broader implications of their decision.

Stupidity

Another aspect is stupidity. The offer of a significant contract to individuals without relevant experience is indicative of a lack of critical thinking within the organization. The failure to perform even a cursory check on potential candidates highlights a systemic issue within the company. This mistake could have been easily avoided with proper planning and oversight.

Greed

The final factor is greed. The decision reflects a more expansive business philosophy—that fame, regardless of merit, equates to financial gain. Netflix likely saw Meghan and Harry as a high-risk, high-reward proposition, given their global celebrity status. However, the assumption that their presence would automatically translate into viewership and profit overlooks the complexities of the entertainment industry and the challenges of maintaining audience interest.

TV's Clichés and the Brain-Dead Masses

The same rationale applies to other controversial TV shows. The Kardashians, Big Brother, and other talentless celebrities are popular because these programs cater to a specific demographic—people who seek entertainment through the spectacle of famous individuals who are famous for being famous. Netflix's decision to invest in Meghan and Harry likely stemmed from a desire to create similar sensationalized content that can attract viewership.

The Political Agenda Behind the Deal

Another theory is that the deal was part of a broader political agenda. Individuals and organizations close to the Obama administration, such as Meghan and Harry, have been closely associated with Netflix. This connection might suggest that the deal was not purely commercial but also political in nature. The documentary could have been used as a platform to promote certain narratives or agendas.

Organized Hate Campaigns and Public Perception

Despite the massive investment, the documentaries have not necessarily delivered the desired outcomes. Mixed feedback and organized hate campaigns have surfaced, particularly around Meghan’s image and actions. Counterproductive measures like the creation of organized opposing groups and the use of bots and AI to spread negative content suggest that the documentary’s intended impact may be undermined by these efforts.

The Impact of Public Perception

The public’s reception of the documentaries varies widely. Critics argue that the content is bland and lacks substance, failing to provide the exclusive insights that were expected. Other issues, such as dismissive attitudes and racial threats, highlight the complex social dynamics at play. The premise that the Queen’s innermost thoughts were shared with unauthorized parties is seen as a far-fetched notion, and the idea that the royals never complain or explain is a misrepresentation of their behavior.

In conclusion, Netflix’s decision to invest $100 million in documentaries featuring Meghan and Harry raises questions about the company's strategic thinking and the broader implications of leveraging fame for financial gain. The failure to deliver on expectations and the backlash from various quarters underscore the complexities of the entertainment industry and the challenges of managing public perception.