Morality of Revenge vs Forgiveness in Dealing with Bad Deeds

The question of whether it is morally right to retaliate against those who have wronged us is a complex one that has been debated for centuries. Traditionally, the concept of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth can be seen in ancient texts such as the Bible. These phrases were initially meant to reduce conflict by promoting rational and proportionate responses rather than escalating violence.

Thiruvalluvar’s Perspective on Forgiveness

A great Tamil poet, Thiruvalluvar, beautifully encapsulates the essence of forgiveness in his work:

‘If you wish to punish the person who hurts you, do good to him, thereby causing him embarrassment.’

Forgiving those who have wronged us can be a powerful act that not only heals our own wounds but also breaks the cycle of revenge and retribution. Holding onto grudges can weigh heavily on one’s heart, causing prolonged emotional strain and suffering.

A Rational Approach to Justice

The concept of retributive justice often necessitates punishment for those who have committed crimes. However, the question arises as to whether such punishment is morally justified, especially when considering the extent of the wrongdoer’s actions.

Is it morally right to let individuals such as murderers, rapists, and child molesters continue their harmful actions? The answer to this question is complex and contentious, as it involves assessing the voluntariness of their actions.

Voluntary vs Involuntary Actions

Justice implies a wrong action that was voluntarily committed. When individuals are convicted of crimes, they are often given punishment that aims to prevent them from committing similar offenses in the future. However, the moral justification of this approach depends on whether the individual’s actions were voluntary.

Moral justice would consider whether the criminal had a choice to commit the crime or not. If the actions were involuntary, then the punishment would be deemed immoral. Many argue that certain crimes, such as those involving severe trauma or wrongful actions driven by past experiences or upbringing, may fall into this category.

Is it morally right for God to withhold Heaven from sinners, given that sin is often seen as an insult to God?

Conclusion

The morality of revenge versus forgiveness in the face of bad deeds remains a deeply personal and philosophical question. While some may argue that justice and punishment are necessary to maintain societal order, others believe that forgiveness is the higher moral ground that promotes peace and healing.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to seek revenge or forgive must be guided by one's own values and the broader ethical considerations of the society at large.