Introduction to Army Revolts and Government Misuse

The Apparent Absence of Dialogue

In recent years, there have been several instances where the military within various governments have shown signs of revolt or outright actions against the ruling political bodies. One notable example is the 16th December 2013 incident in South Sudan. Initially, the government termed this event an "attempted military coup," but the reality was a complex web of internal political disputes—specifically, the misuse of the army for political ends. This manipulation has left citizens questioning the efficacy of using military force to resolve political disputes and the consequential loss of many lives.

A Devastating List of Misuse Incidents

Military revolts and political coups are not new phenomena. A quick overview reveals a long history, dating back to before recorded history. Below, we examine some significant military revolts since the turn of the current decade.

Recent Military Revolts and Coups

2010 - Niger: Salou Djibo led a coup against President Mamadou Tandja. The current government swiftly reasserted control, emphasizing the importance of respecting constitutional processes.

2011 - Egypt: A revolution led by Mohamed Hussein Tantawi against President Hosni Mubarak occurred amid mass protests, leading to the eventual end of Mubarak's authoritarian rule.

2012 - Maldives: Amid political turmoil, Malian soldiers under Captain Amadou Sanogo led a coup against President Amadou Toumani Touré, highlighting the fluidity of political loyalty.

2013-2019: A prolonged series of military actions in countries such as Sudan, Libya, and South Sudan, reflecting a broader trend of militaries challenging established political order due to perceived misuse of power for personal or party gains.

2014 - Thailand: The Royal Thai Armed Forces, led by General Prayut Chan-o-cha, overthrew the government, establishing a military junta to take control.

2015 - Burundi: A failed coup attempt by General Godefroid Niyombare against President Pierre Nkurunziza highlighted internal political divisions within the military.

Military revolts often stem from a combination of factors, including the misuse of military power for political ends, economic underdevelopment, and political instability. In many cases, leaders misappropriated their authority, leading to revolts by rank-and-file soldiers who felt disillusioned with their commanders' actions.

The Impact of Misuse and Revolts

Military revolts can have severe consequences on a nation. They often lead to political instability, loss of life, and economic downturn. The 2013 Egyptian coup détat, for example, not only removed President Mohamed Morsi from power but also suspended the constitution, leading to extended periods of political uncertainty and social unrest.

Another key instance is the failed coup in Chad on 1 May 2013 against President Idriss Déby. Brought about by the misuse of state resources and political discontent, the attempted coup underscored the growing tension between the military and the ruling elite.

Military revolts also highlight the tension between the military's role as a stabilizing force and its potential to undermine democratic processes. The 2017 Zimbabwean coup détat, for instance, showcased the military's use of force to resolve political disagreements, demonstrating the power dynamics at play during tumultuous times.

Conclusion: Addressing the Root Causes

To prevent such revolts, it is crucial for governments to address the root causes of discontent within the military. This includes ensuring political neutrality of the military, combating corruption, and promoting economic and social development.

Engaging in transparent and constructive dialogues can help resolve internal political disagreements peacefully. Training programs and professionalizing the military can also enhance the institution's effectiveness and reduce the likelihood of such revolts.

By focusing on these measures, nations can foster a more stable and democratic environment, reducing the need for military intervention in political affairs.