FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Loki and Thor’s Complex Dynamics: The Underlying Causes of Dislike from the Beginning

March 18, 2025Film3888
Introduction Thor and Loki, the two iconic Norse gods, are often portr

Introduction

Thor and Loki, the two iconic Norse gods, are often portrayed as having a contentious relationship. Many fans wonder why Thor did not like Loki from the time they were born. This article delves into the complex dynamics between the brothers, exploring the underlying reasons behind their apparent animosity.

Loki’s Complex Background

Imagine Loki, not as the mischievous lover of chaos you know, but as someone with a different background. Let’s envision Loki as Ramses—perhaps a historical figure like Moses, who was raised as a prince but later adopted. Thor, on the other hand, is depicted as Ramses, the son of a leader destined to become a king, with characteristics reminiscent of the Christ story, where he was 'born to be king' but 'low key' means more than just a simple adoption.

Comparison with Historical Figures

As we compare Loki to Ramses, we can draw a parallel with the biblical figure of Jesus. Just as Jesus was a chosen vessel for a divine mission, Loki was born into a situation that seemed predestined but with a twist. While Jesus faced a more conventional narrative, Loki’s journey was marked by a different set of expectations and disappointments, which shaped his perspective.

Loki as a Figure of Threat

The text suggests that Loki’s supposed 'advantage' and 'assistance' actually serve as a foil to Thor, who is born into a position of kingliness. However, this advantage is not necessarily a positive one. The story portrays Loki as someone who is not just a shadow but a representation of societal and familial power struggles, much like a viking who has come through and destroyed lives, with an eye on his own agenda.

The Role of Ego and Power

Loki’s actions are driven by his ego and a desire for vengeance. He wants to reclaim what he believes is rightfully his, not just in the sense of a throne but in the broader sense of a place in his family and society. This is akin to a viking taking a child as a trophy, symbolizing the brutal and unyielding nature of power.

The Contrast of Brotherly Admiration and Disappointment

Thor, meanwhile, is seen as the ideal king. He has been groomed to be a protector, a prince, and his heart is pure. In contrast, Loki is seen as a figure who is supposed to be his sidekick, a trophy, but not worthy of the throne. The text suggests that Loki’s role is not just a plaything but also a source of frustration for Thor.

Thor’s Perceptions of Loki

Thor is portrayed as someone who has achieved the status he was born into and has not fallen from his high expectations. His heart is pure, and he sees Loki both as a play toy and a villain who stole the spotlight from him. Thor’s closeness with the people of Asgard, his readiness to protect, and his unblemished heart create a stark contrast with Loki’s perceived disloyalty and insubordination.

Thor and Loki’s Search for Identity

Both Thor and Loki are on a quest for their identities. Thor goes through struggles to prove himself, while Loki, after his father’s destruction of a planet and his own capture, seeks to reclaim what is his. His journey is marked by a sense of betrayal and a desire for a proper place in his family and society.

Thor’s Character

Thor is the protector, the warrior, and the one who has never crumbled under pressure. He is a figure of stability and unwavering hope. His world is structured around the expectations of duty and honor. Loki, in contrast, is often seen as a shadow figure, a menace, and a usurper of what he feels should be his rightful place.

Conclusion

The relationship between Thor and Loki is multifaceted and deeply rooted in the cultural and family dynamics of their respective societies. Thor’s dislike of Loki can be attributed to the unspoken expectations and the stark contrast between their roles and destinies. As they navigate their complex paths, the question remains: what exactly drives their perpetual conflict and what does it reveal about their individual and collective identities?