FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Lincoln on Screen: A Reevaluation of His Portrayal in 2012’s Lincoln

February 03, 2025Film4962
Lincoln on Screen: A Reevaluation of His Portrayal in 2012’s Lincoln I

Lincoln on Screen: A Reevaluation of His Portrayal in 2012’s Lincoln

Introduction

The 2012 film Lincoln is a biographical drama that delves into a pivotal period of American history surrounding the 16th President, Abraham Lincoln. Despite historical controversies and various critiques, the film has garnered critical acclaim and Oscar-winning performances. Would President Lincoln, known famously as 'Honest Abe,' approve of his portrayal? This article explores the historical fidelity of the remake and offers an evaluation of the actors' performances from a twenty-first-century perspective.

Historical Accuracy in Portrayal

In evaluating the film's adherence to historical facts, it is essential to consider the intentions of its creators. Spielberg chose to focus on a specific timeframe of Lincoln's presidency, emphasizing his efforts to enact the 13th Amendment, which officially abolished slavery in the United States. According to historian David Levering Lewis, the film's depiction aligns closely with the historical record. Lincoln, while a politician, was also deeply devoted to the abolition of slavery, making him a compelling figure in the narrative of the Civil War era.

Tommy Lee Jones and Thaddeus Stevens

Among the most memorable performances in the film is Tommy Lee Jones as Senator Thaddeus Stevens. Stevens was a controversial figure in Congress, and his portrayal by Jones is both intense and nuanced. Jones's irascible depiction captures the fiery and often controversial nature of Stevens, a strong proponent of civil rights. Historically, Stevens was indeed known for his relentless pursuit of abolition and his confrontational style in Congress. While some critics argue that Stevens may not have been as temperamental as portrayed, the film's ambition to illustrate his character's complex nature is appreciated.

Sally Field and Mary Todd Lincoln

Sally Field gives a powerful and emotionally intricate performance as Mary Todd Lincoln. Her portrayal of the emotional fragility and personal struggles of the First Lady is both affecting and authentic. Field's acting conveys the depth of Lincoln's personal life and the toll the Civil War took on the family. Historical records indicate that Mary Lincoln's mental health and personal life were indeed tumultuous during this period. However, the film takes liberties in depicting her relationships and the inner workings of the White House, which some historians argue might be fictionalized.

David Strathairn and William Seward

David Strathairn delivers a measured and calculating performance as William Seward, the Secretary of State. His portrayal is respectful and subtle, reflecting Seward's political acumen and strategic mind. Historically, Seward was indeed instrumental in the passage of the 13th Amendment and his diplomatic maneuverings. Strathairn's performance aligns closely with the historical figure, providing an insightful and intelligent reflection of Seward's character.

Jared Harris and General Grant

Although Jared Harris appears in only a few scenes as General William Tecumseh Sherman, his performance is noteworthy. His brief but impactful scenes introduce a sense of the broader context of the Civil War. Historically, Sherman's military campaigns played a significant role in the Union's victory. Harris's portrayal adds authenticity to the portrayal, reflecting the complexities of military leadership during this conflict.

Conclusion: Lincoln’s Perspective

Considering Lincoln's reputation for honesty and pragmatism, it is likely that he would view the film with a balance of satisfaction and critique. The film's historical accuracy, while not perfect, offers a compelling narrative that aligns with the broader historical record. Each actor's performance is a testament to the filmmakers' ambition to capture the essence of these historical figures effectively. Whether Lincoln would have approved of the portrayal is a matter of conjecture, but the film serves as an important and thought-provoking exploration of one of America's most influential presidents.