What Do You Think of Joseph Smith’s Version of the Bible?

Graham C. Lindsay requested my take on the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) of the Bible. While the LDS (Mormon) faith uses the King James Version (KJV) as one of its translations, the JST is a unique version that has been a subject of debate among scholars and believers alike. In this article, I will provide an in-depth analysis of the JST, comparing it with the KJV and the historical context of its creation.

Joseph Smith’s Version of the Bible: A Personal Opinion

From a personal standpoint, I can confidently say that the JST does not hold up to scrutiny. While the KJV is a standard reference for many Christians, the JST is rife with inconsistencies and inaccuracies. Smith claimed to have been guided by divine inspiration in translating the Bible, but his version remains controversial and often dismissed by scholars and critics alike.

Historical Context and Content

The JST, published in 1844, is a revision of the KJV, with additional verses and passages that Smith claimed were revealed to him in a series of visionary experiences. While the KJV first appeared in 1611, Smith used the 1769 revision of the KJV, which was still fairly close to the original.

The Inconsistencies with Modern English

One of the most significant criticisms of the JST is the use of 1769 English. Given that the Book of Mormon is also written in 17th-century English, it is perplexing that Smith would opt for an ancient-sounding version of the KJV. In the 19th century, English had evolved considerably, and it would have been more appropriate for Smith to use a more contemporary translation. This discrepancy raises questions about the authenticity of the JST and the claim of divine revelation.

The Historical Record

Joseph Smith’s historical record is not without controversy. He was known for his financial schemes, including claims of producing gold plates and selling them as the Book of Mormon. His actions in various towns, such as religious conflicts and the burning of printing presses, further colored the perception of his character during his lifetime. Critics argue that if Smith were truly a prophet, he would not have engaged in such activities.

Archaeological and Historical Evidence

Archaeological evidence also challenges the claims made by the JST. For instance, attempts to translate ancient Egyptian papyri and the Kinderhook plates have failed to yield any substantial results. Similarly, the failed retranslation of the 116 lost pages raises doubts about the ability of Smith to accurately interpret and translate ancient texts.

The Cultural and Historical Significance

While the Bible serves as a valuable historical document, providing insight into the culture and beliefs of ancient Israel, the JST is often seen as a problematic supplement to this understanding. The Bible is a complex text, with layers of interpretation, cultural context, and historical significance. The JST adds an additional layer of complexity, often complicating rather than clarifying the original text.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Joseph Smith’s version of the Bible, as represented by the JST, remains a contentious issue. While it may hold some interest for believers, from a critical and historical perspective, it is challenging to consider as a reliable source of religious or historical information. The discrepancies with contemporary English, Smith’s historical record, and the lack of archaeological support all contribute to the skepticism surrounding the JST. For those interested in further exploring these issues, conducting a simple online search using the keyword 'Joseph Smith' will provide a wealth of resources and perspectives.