Jon Snow's Name in the Books: Aegon, Aemon, or Jaehaerys?

In the expansive world of George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series, the question of whether Jon Snow's name will be Aegon, Aemon, or Jaehaerys remains a topic of much speculation among fans. Each potential name carries deep cultural, historical, and thematic significance, making the choice a crucial element in the storytelling.

My Personal Prediction: Aegon VII

Among the suggestions, I believe Jon’s name will be Aegon VII. This choice is deeply rooted in the symbolism of the Targaryen heritage and the context of the Faith of the Seven. The name Aegon is a clear nod to the Dragonibs of Westeros, particularly Aegon the Conqueror, who established House Targaryen’s dominance over the realm.

The use of 'VII' serves as a significant emblem that Jon is the true seventh ruler of the Seven Kingdoms, as opposed to the traditional view that suggests there were only six legitimate Targaryen kings. This interpretation fits well within the broader narrative of the series, where the true history and nature of the Seven Kingdoms are gradually revealed.

Fan Speculation: Aemon, the Targaryen Uncle

Several fans have proposed naming Jon after Aemon, his paternal uncle and esteemed mentor. Aemon Targaryen, often referred to as 'Aemon the Dragonknight,' is a legendary figure in the history of Westeros. Naming Jon after him would be a way to honor the lineage and legacy of his father and to highlight the deep connection between Aemon and the Stark family.

However, there is a poignant reason many prefer not to name Jon after Aegon. The name Aegon carries significant historical weight, as it reminds us of the brutal murder of Aegon V, who failed to prevent the War of the Five Kings. The previous Aegon's name serves as a painful reminder of the Targaryen lineage's past misfortunes, making it an unappealing choice for many.

Jaehaerys: A Hymn to Governance

Among the proposed names, Jaehaerys is one of the favorites. The name honors Jaehaerys I Targaryen, also known as the Conciliator, one of the most celebrated Targaryen kings in Westerosi history. His reign, though often portrayed as relatively uneventful, was marked by great governance and prosperity.

Jaehaerys' reign is often cited as a model of effective leadership, and his legacy as a great governor is cherished by many characters in the series. Naming Jon after Jaehaerys would underscore the idea that he is destined to be a just and wise ruler, further aligning with the themes of governance and decision-making that run throughout the series.

John Forsayth, a beloved historical figure, also had a deep sense of duty and governance that aligns well with what we know about Jon's character. This connection would serve to emphasize Jon's role as a leader and his potential for greatness.

Other Proposed Names: Aegon, Viserys, or Daeron

There are other possibilities worth considering, such as Aegon (possibly in recognition of Visenya), or Daeron. The name Aegon could be a tribute to Visenya, the mother of the Targaryen dragonlords, making it a powerful and symbolic choice. However, given the already established Aegon, this is less likely.

Daeron, on the other hand, could be in recognition of Rhaenys. However, the more probable choice might be Jaehaerys or Daeron, given the thematic and historical significance.

Daeron is considered Jon's favorite Targaryen, and his name could also be an allusion to the lesser known Children of the Dragon, who were faithful to the Night's Watch. This would further establish the idea of Jon as a Targaryen who aligns with the values of the Night's Watch and the older, more benevolent aspects of the Targaryen legacy.

Jon’s Birth Name: A Stark, Not a Targaryen

The context of Jon's birth is deeply intertwined with the narrative. The moment when Ned Stark found Lyanna with the newborn in the blood-soaked bed is a pivotal scene. In that moment of uncertainty and despair, Ned's primary concern was to secure the survival of the child, his sister's son.

The significance of the name chosen for the child cannot be overstated. As a Stark, the child is a direct descendant of House Stark, not an illegitimate Targaryen. Given the complex history of the Starks and Targaryens, it makes sense that Ned, in a time of conflict and turmoil, might choose a name that reflects his loyalty to his House and his kin rather than to a lineage beset by bloodshed and tragedy.

The name Jon is a simple and direct choice, reflecting the Stark values of strength, perseverance, and duty. It is a name that honors his true lineage and represents the unification of houses Stark and Targaryen, rather than a reliance on the flawed legacy of past Targaryen kings.

The question of Jon's name opens up a vast array of possibilities, each with its own narrative implications. The final choice will undoubtedly shape the story in profound ways, influencing the reader's perception of Jon's character and his role in the larger arc of Westeros.