FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Jolly LLB vs Jolly LLB 2: A Comparative Analysis and the Controversy over Cultural Recognition in Bollywood

March 03, 2025Film2403
Introduction Indian cinema, often referred to as Bollywood, has a rich

Introduction

Indian cinema, often referred to as Bollywood, has a rich history of courtroom comedies that resonate with the masses. Two such films that have garnered significant attention and appreciation are Jolly LLB (2013) and its sequel Jolly LLB 2 (2017). Both films tackle the legal system from different angles, offering unique insights and entertainment to their audiences. However, the second film has faced criticism not only for its content but also for its handling of cultural representation. This article delves into a detailed comparison of the two films and explores the cultural controversies surrounding one of the main actresses in Jolly LLB 2.

Comparison of Jolly LLB (2013) and Jolly LLB 2 (2017)

Director and Plot

Both films, Jolly LLB (2013) and Jolly LLB 2 (2017), were directed by the renowned Subhash Kapoor. The original film Jolly LLB (2013) is a courtroom comedy that follows the story of Jagdish Prasad Mishra, who embarks on a legal battle to prove his innocence after being wrongfully accused. The sequel, Jolly LLB 2 (2017), continues this theme but introduces a new protagonist, Jagdish's rival.

Themes and Reception

Jolly LLB (2013) is known for its realistic portrayal of the Indian legal system and its critique of the flaws within it. The film delves into themes of justice, moral dilemmas, and the pursuit of truth. It was highly praised for its sharp social commentary and witty writing. Akshay Kumar's performance as Jagdish, along with strong contributions from Arshad Warsi, earned critical acclaim.

In contrast, Jolly LLB 2 (2017) takes a more commercial approach. It includes elements of drama, action, and comedy, making it more accessible to a broader audience. The film's storyline is more engaging, but its social commentary is less pronounced. Despite this, it still received positive feedback for Akshay Kumar's performance and the overall narrative.

Conclusion

Choosing between these two films ultimately depends on personal preference. For those who value a deeper social commentary and a grounded story, Jolly LLB (2013) might resonate more. However, those seeking a more entertaining mix of drama, action, and comedy may find Jolly LLB 2 (2017) more appealing.

A Cultural Controversy in Jolly LLB 2

The Role of Huma Qureshi in State vs Jolly LLB-2

One of the most significant points of controversy in Jolly LLB 2 (2017) is the role of Huma Qureshi. In the film, she plays the character of Pushpa Pandey, a Hindu Pandit/Brahmin lady by caste and the wife of the protagonist Jagdeeshwar Prasad Mishra. The main issue revolves around the fact that Huma Qureshi does not wear a bindi or sindoor on her forehead, which is a significant Hindu tradition.

Many viewers and critics have questioned why Huma Qureshi, a well-known actress, would not adhere to these cultural norms. The absence of the bindi and sindoor has been a point of contention, with some arguing that it is disrespectful to Hindu traditions and culture.

Why the Controversy?

The absence of the bindi and sindoor in Huma Qureshi's character raises questions about cultural representation and authenticity in Bollywood. These symbols are integral to Hindu rituals and cultural identity, and their omission has been seen as a form of cultural insensitivity. The controversy also highlights the broader issue of religious and cultural practices being handled with care and respect in Bollywood films.

Call for Boycott

The controversy has sparked a call for a boycott of Huma Qureshi and other actresses who fail to respect Hindu traditions in their roles. Some Hindu viewers and organizations have stated that actors should adhere to cultural norms when representing characters from specific communities. They argue that it is not just about respecting cultural traditions but about building a sense of unity and respect across different cultures in India.

However, it is essential to approach such calls for boycott with a nuanced understanding. Films play a crucial role in shaping public opinion and can be a medium for cultural exchange and education. Refusal to cast actors who do not adhere to certain cultural practices can limit the representation of diverse talents and hinder cultural inclusivity.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding Huma Qureshi's role in Jolly LLB 2 (2017) highlights the complexities of cultural representation in modern Bollywood. While there is a valid argument for cultural sensitivity, it is crucial to find a balance between respecting traditions and embracing diversity. Ultimately, the decision should be made with careful consideration and respect for the traditions and beliefs of all communities in the country.