J.R.R. Tolkien’s Views on Peter Jacksons Hobbit Adaptations: A Critical Analysis
J.R.R. Tolkien’s Views on Peter Jackson’s Hobbit Adaptations: A Critical Analysis
Is it true that J.R.R. Tolkien despised the way Peter Jackson adapted his beloved books into movies, particularly regarding The Hobbit? This article delves into the available evidence and insights to explore Tolkien's stance on what were his own creations being turned into films decades after his passing.
Tolkien's Perspective on The Hobbit
According to the available records, there is no evidence suggesting that Tolkien ever took a dislike to The Hobbit as a whole after its completion. This novel is steeped in Tolkien's own literary vision, and while a writer of such high critical standards might observe flaws, there is no indication that these flaws led to an outright disapproval.
However, it is well-documented that Tolkien had expressed similar thoughts about The Lord of the Rings. In one of his writings, he articulated his perspective that the book was too short. While this criticism is rooted in the perfectionist principles that underpin his creative process, it is also a demonstration of his meticulous attention to detail.
Tolkien and Retcons: Concepts and Examples
Tolkien did make one notable remark about the names of the Dwarves in The Hobbit. In a post-hoc analysis, he acknowledged that he had borrowed these names from the Poetic Edda, a collection of Old Norse poetry. Initially, this decision may have seemed hasty. However, Tolkien later offered a more detailed explanation that these names could be seen as adopted, rather than true, names. Dwarves, in Tolkien's world, do not reveal their true names to outsiders. Instead, they take on names from surrounding cultures, allowing the names in modern translations to bear a linguistic relationship to Westron as Old Norse does to Modern English.
Tolkien’s Relationship with the Film Industry and Adaptations
Despite his initial reservations, there is no concrete evidence suggesting that Tolkien ever expressed direct dislike for the film adaptations of his works, including the Peter Jackson series. In 1957, Tolkien’s concerns about a possible film adaptation of The Lord of the Rings were expressed in a letter, revealing his caution and skepticism. Similarly, in a 1964 letter, he further doubted the possibility of adapting The Lord of the Rings for the screen.
Interestingly, Tolkien had a somewhat contentious relationship with the film industry, with several failed attempts to adapt his works. However, it should be noted that these earlier attempts did not involve Peter Jackson, and thus do not provide a clear indication of Tolkien's opinion on his specific adaptations.
Uncertainty and Speculation
In the absence of firsthand evidence or conclusive statements by Tolkien regarding his personal opinion on Peter Jackson’s films, it is challenging to definitively state his stance. The general sentiment from the available data is that Tolkien had reservations about adaptations, but his specific views on the Peter Jackson films remain speculative.
The Poetic Edda and The Hobbit
Tolkien was known to have borrowed the names of the Dwarves from the Poetic Edda, a poetic collection from the Viking era. This decision was not without controversy, as the names did not fit seamlessly into the linguistic landscape he had meticulously crafted for his Middle-earth. Tolkien later rectified this by proposing a retcon (retroactive continuity) that explained the names as adopted by the Dwarves rather than their true names. This explanation allowed for a more cohesive narrative within his larger mythology.
Conclusion
While Tolkien did express some reservations about the possibility of adaptations of his work, it is unclear what his specific opinion would have been on the Peter Jackson films. The available evidence suggests that he had a cautious and even skeptical attitude towards adaptations, but this does not necessarily translate to outright dislikes of the final productions. The true sentiment must remain a subject of speculation until new evidence emerges.