Introduction

During the collapse of Yugoslavia, Italy faced complex geopolitical decisions regarding the region of Istria. It is a common misconception that Italy ever seriously contemplated or attempted to retake Istria, which was never legally subject to its control in the first place. This article explores the truth behind these ambitious plans, focusing on the political, military, and constitutional constraints that prevented such actions.

The Legal and Territorial Context

Istria's Historical Background: The region of Istria was never truly Italian, contrary to popular belief. Following the Second World War, the borders between Italy and Yugoslavia were definitively settled by the Treaty of Osimo in 1975. This treaty established the boundaries that remain in effect today, with Istria firmly within the territory of former Yugoslavia, now split between Slovenia and Croatia.

Constitutional Prohibition: According to Article 11 of the Italian Constitution, 'Italy rejects war as an instrument of aggression against the freedom of other peoples, and as a means for the settlement of international disputes.' This stance legally and morally binds the Italian government, making any aggressive military action against former Yugoslav territories impossible.

Political Propaganda and Electoral Tactics

Electoral Propaganda: During the late 20th century, some Italian politicians used the Istrian issue as a political tactic to gain support from the Italian community there. The Italian Social Movement, a neofascist party, and other mainstream parties with local branches in Trieste employed this strategy as an electoral stunt.

Diplomatic Renegotiation: There were talks of renegotiating the Treaty of Osimo. However, these were primarily aimed at gaining political leverage and were never seriously considered as a feasible option. The political climate, economic challenges, and the evolving international legal framework made such efforts impractical.

Military Feasibility and Consequences

Military Feasibility: From a strictly military perspective, retaking Istria might have been feasible. The Croatian and Slovenian forces were focused on fighting the central Yugoslav government, which could have made the region more vulnerable.

Political and Economic Consequences: However, any attempt would have been a disaster from a diplomatic, economic, and political standpoint. It would have been an illegal act of aggression, condemned by the United Nations and likely resulting in expulsion from the European Economic Community (EEC) just as it was evolving into the European Union (EU).

Unfavorable Public Opinion: Internationally, Italy would have faced widespread condemnation. Domestically, the Italian government would have faced legal challenges, mass demonstrations, and potential political unrest, discrediting the state and legality under the Constitution.

Economic Implications: Even if the retaking were to succeed, it would have left Italy with an antagonistic border region. The influx of refugees and the potential for violence and cross-border conflicts could have severe economic repercussions, particularly in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region.

Conclusion

The aspiration of the Italian government to retake Istria during the Yugoslav crisis was more a political stunt than a genuine attempt at territorial recovery. The constitutional and legal restraints, coupled with the evolving geopolitical landscape, made such an effort not only impractical but also ill-advised. The historical context, constitutional bindings, and the legal framework of the post-Yugoslav era make it clear that any such actions would have been against the interests of both Italy and the global community.

References:

1. Example Link 1 2. Example Link 2