Is 'U-571' Even More Historically Inaccurate Than 'Braveheart'? A Comparative Analysis

Two films that are often cited for their historical inaccuracies are U-571 and Braveheart. While both are known to take creative liberties with historical facts, they differ in the nature and impact of those inaccuracies. In this article, we will explore the historical inaccuracies in both films and compare their levels of inaccuracy.

U-571

Plot Overview

The film U-571 (2000) is a fictionalized account of a World War II mission in which American submariners capture a German U-boat to obtain an Enigma machine. The movie depicts this event in a dramatic and action-packed manner, which enhances its entertainment value but at the expense of historical accuracy.

Historical Inaccuracies

The film implies that American forces were the first to capture a U-boat and seize an Enigma machine. This is not true; the British had already accomplished this in 1941 with the U-570. The portrayal of the U.S. Navy's involvement in submarine warfare is dramatized for effect, obscuring the roles of British forces in these operations.

Braveheart

Plot Overview

Braveheart (1995) tells the story of William Wallace, a Scottish knight who became a leader in the struggle for Scotland's independence from England. The film is a dramatic and romanticized portrayal of Wallace's life and exploits.

Historical Inaccuracies

The film takes significant liberties with historical events, characters, and timelines. For example, Wallace and Robert the Bruce had a more complex relationship than depicted in the film. The film also presents battles and events out of chronological order, exaggerating certain aspects of Wallace's life and achievements.

Comparison: Scope of Inaccuracy

U-571 is criticized primarily for misrepresenting specific historical events and contributions, particularly regarding the Enigma machine and the roles of American and British forces. The film focuses on a narrow, dramatic representation of an event that overshadows the actual historical context.

Braveheart, on the other hand, is often seen as a more egregious offender in terms of historical accuracy. The film's broad reinterpretation of Scottish history, key figures, and events creates a more significant departure from actual historical facts. Its dramatic elements often overshadow the historical realism of the characters and their actions.

Conclusion

While both films take creative liberties, the nature and scope of their inaccuracies differ. 'U-571' misrepresents specific historical events and contributions, while 'Braveheart' engages in a broader reinterpretation of historical facts. This makes both films subject to criticism from historians and critics who seek factual accuracy in historical films. Therefore, in terms of historical accuracy, 'Braveheart' might be considered a more egregious offender.

Is there another historical film that has been so inaccurate that a government would condemn it as an affront to the real participants? One notable example is U-571. The film, despite a brief acknowledgment of Polish and British/UK contributions, is often dismissed as "Hollywood Bullshit," highlighting how these inaccuracies can impact public perception and understanding of historical events.

Generally, 'U-571' and 'Braveheart' can both be described as 'enjoyable hokum or rubbish.' While they provide entertainment, they also contribute to a broader problem in historical filmography, where creative license often exceeds the boundaries of historical truth.