Is There Evidence Donald Trump Was a Confidential Informant for New York State?

Are there any real chances of the former US President, Donald Trump, having been a confidential informant for New York State? The answer is a resounding no, for several reasons.

Public Perception and Reputation

Donald Trump is deeply hated in New York, a place where he has faced numerous legal and political challenges. The idea that he would be considered a reliable informant by anyone in a position of authority is highly improbable. Not only is he seen as a polarizing figure, but his track record of self-serving business practices and alleged criminal activities further undermines any potential trust in his integrity.

Official Documentations and Historical Context

It is a matter of public record that Donald Trump was, in fact, involved with New York's law enforcement and was seen as a confidential informant in the past, not just for the state, but for New Jersey law enforcement as well. This involvement is highlighted by his ability to maintain his AC casino licenses in a way that others could not, even when they committed lesser offenses than paying bribes to known criminals.

The practice of confidential informants is far from a myth of "Omerta." Many figures have shared their versions of events to avoid charges and civil forfeitures. For instance, Trump has had ongoing relationships with numerous known mobsters, including Salerno, Castellano, Sullivan, Tevfik, Arif, Scarfo, Testa, Leonetti, and Libutti, since the mid-1980s. These connections have often involved legal transgressions, leading to deeper involvement in law enforcement investigations.

Key Incidents and Allegations

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence lies in Trump's 1986 agreement with state tax prosecutors to avoid a tax evasion charge in relation to 'The Empty Jewelry Box Scam.' In this con, Trump testified against Bulgari, a premier jewelry brand, thus avoiding legal consequences. This move also contributed to bringing down the New York Mafia families on a large scale, as informed by confidential informants and flipped insiders.

Felix Sater, a partner in Trump's business and a second-generation Russian mobster, provided crucial evidence when he wore a wire after his second felony conviction. This cooperation, known as being 'flipped' by law enforcement, demonstrates the extent to which mob members often shared information to avoid legal penalties. It is unlikely that Sater or the Russian FSB would have agreed to such cooperation if Trump were to be a reliable informant for the state. His history of inconsistent and easily manipulated statements would have been a significant obstacle for law enforcement.

Conclusion

The evidence suggests that Donald Trump was far from a trusted informant. If anything, his connections to known criminals and his susceptibility to bribery and manipulation make him a poor candidate for such a role. Any claims suggesting otherwise would need to be backed by substantial and undeniable evidence, which is currently lacking.