Is 'Taken' a Good Movie? Why or Why Not

Introduction

Is 'Taken' a good movie? This is a question that has divided opinions. While some appreciate the film's action and moments of tension, others find it lacking in substance. In this article, we will explore the movie's strengths and weaknesses, focusing on directing, acting, and plot to determine its overall quality.

Acting and Performances

Liam Neeson's Performance

Is 'Taken' a Good Movie? Here, the standout is undoubtedly Liam Neeson's portrayal of Bryan Mills, a 'tough guy' character. His on-screen presence and the intensity of his performance contribute significantly to the film's appeal. Neeson's physical and emotional performance in the action sequences is commendable, adding a layer of realism and gravitas to the character. However, Neeson's efforts alone do not elevate the entire cast to the same level of quality.

The Wood from Elsewhere

The rest of the cast, however, does not fare as well. The performances are described as 'wooden,' which signifies a lack of emotion and complexity. Supporting actors such as Famke Jansen, who plays Bryan's wife, and Famke's daughter, provided by Millie Bloor, do not bring substantial depth to their characters. The thinly developed and unsympathetic nature of the characters undermines the film's emotional impact, making it hard for the audience to engage fully with the story.

Plot and Pacing

The Core of the Story

The plot of 'Taken' is criticized for being transparent and unbelievable. The arbitrary 48-hour deadline feels artificial and unwarranted, as it is heavily debated how a major city with a robust police force would handle a kidnapping under such conditions. The police embedding themselves in the plot seems unrealistic, especially in a setting as developed as Paris. The characters, particularly the victims and antagonists, are not given adequate motivations, leading to a disjointed and underdeveloped narrative.

Economic and Political Cliches

The film is also accused of being filled with clichés, which detract from its overall quality. Characters and situations lack originality, and the villains are portrayed as generic and uninteresting. The overall feeling is one of inevitability, as the protagonist consistently finds a way out of every predicament. This lack of unpredictability diminishes the film's tension and suspense, making it feel more like a straightforward action movie than a thriller.

Alternatives to 'Taken'

Other Options to Consider

For those looking for a better version of a suspense movie, 'Taken' is not necessarily the best choice. Instead, classic films like Alfred Hitchcock's 'The Man Who Knew Too Much' (1950s version) offer a more nuanced approach to suspense and character development. These films provide a richer emotional and intellectual experience, with James Stewart's portrayal of an untrained yet effective protagonist setting a higher standard for the genre.

Conclusion

While 'Taken' has its merits, particularly in the realm of action and stunt sequences, its overall quality is diminished by its wooden performances, unrealistic plot, and generic villains. For a more engaging and cohesive suspense movie experience, audiences may want to look elsewhere.