Is Joel the Villain in The Last of Us 2?
Is Joel the Villain in The Last of Us 2?
The character of Joel Miller in The Last of Us has garnered significant attention and debate among players and critics alike. In the original game, Joel is portrayed as a protector of Ellie, with his decision to save her from being used to create a vaccine framed as a morally ambiguous but ultimately heroic act. However, in the sequel, his past actions have profound and often controversial consequences that unfold throughout the story, leading many to question his role as a villain.
Context and Interpretation
Some players view Joel as a clear villain due to the impact of his choices and the cycle of violence that ensues. His actions set off a chain reaction that drives much of the narrative in the sequel. For instance, by killing the only remaining man capable of creating a vaccine, Joel may have set back the cause of humanity, suggesting that his actions may have been fatal for the future of humankind. This choice, while presumably driven by desperation and love for Ellie, is undeniably violent and morally complex.
Conversely, others see Joel as a tragic figure whose love for Ellie leads him to make desperate choices. His past actions, which involved terrible and amoral acts to survive, are heavily implied to be a significant factor in his redemption. By protecting and saving Ellie, he achieves a level of personal redemption, albeit still carrying a significant guilt that taints his final moments. This interpretation portrays him as a flawed hero rather than a villain, highlighting the complexity of his character and the moral ambiguity of his actions.
The Game's Narrative and Player Perspective
The game itself encourages players to grapple with the themes of morality, loyalty, and the consequences of one's actions. These themes make Joel a rich subject for discussion, as his character embodies both heroism and villainy depending on the player's perspective. This interplay between good and evil, and the exploration of these themes, elevates The Last of Us beyond mere plot progression to a profound examination of the human condition.
Debate and Controversy
The sequels, especially the narrative and depiction of Joel in The Last of Us Part II, generated significant debate. While the first game is often praised for its depth and emotional impact, the second installment received criticism for how it handled Joel's character. Many players, including notable figures like Neil Druckmann, have faced backlash for their portrayal of Joel. Druckmann's decision to further destabilize Joel's moral compass and ultimately depict him in a particularly unflattering light has been met with strong disapproval, solidifying the perception of the game as a "wokeness" that some found detrimental to the original narrative and character.
A Masterpiece of Storytelling
Despite the criticism, it is undeniable that The Last of Us, both the original and the sequel, are masterpieces. The game's storytelling, particularly with respect to the character of Joel, is a testament to the developers' skill in weaving a narrative that elicits deep emotional responses from players. The loss of Joel's daughter in the first act is paralleled by his effective gaining of another in the last, a narrative structure that underscores the cyclical nature of loss and redemption. This mastery extends to the gameplay mechanics as well, creating an immersive and emotionally rich experience.
In conclusion, whether Joel Miller is seen as a villain or a tragic hero depends largely on one's perspective and the choice to engage with the themes of morality, loyalty, and the consequences of one's actions. The game's rich narrative and character development make it a subject of ongoing debate and analysis, reflecting its significance in the gaming industry and its enduring impact on players.