Is Fan-Fiction Suitable for Evaluation by Writers' Black Lists?

In the intricate world of creative writing, the inclusion of fan-fiction in the evaluation process under writers' black lists is a contentious issue. Many industry professionals and writers, including notable figures like Mercedes Lackey, have weighing the benefits and potential legal risks of considering such content.

The Role of Black Lists in the Writing Industry

Writers' black lists, such as the Writer's Guild of America (WGA) blacklist, serve a crucial function in maintaining ethical standards within the industry. These lists typically identify freelancers or writers who have violated industry guidelines, engaged in unethical behavior, or received negative reviews for their work.

The primary purpose of these lists is to ensure a fair and competitive environment for all writers, by deterring unethical practices and maintaining professional integrity. When fan-fiction is brought into this equation, however, questions of professionalism and legal boundaries arise.

Writers who are part of established writing communities and are involved in collaborative projects with an inner logic and planned path often view their work as more akin to professional scripts rather than fan-created content. This perspective is rooted in the collaboration and the framework that these writers have developed together.

The Concerns with Evaluating Fan-Fiction

Merge content, the creator of a popular fan-fiction application, has pointed out the potential risks and complications that accompany the evaluation of fan-fiction. One of the primary concerns is the risk of legal action. Writers like Mercedes Lackey, who are well-regarded in the community, often receive numerous fan-submitted ideas and story plots. Any perceived similarity to these ideas could directly implicate the writer in plagiarism or copyright infringement.

The case of Mercedes Lackey serves as a cautionary tale. In a multitude of responses to fan correspondence, Lackey has emphasized the importance of originality and the potential legal ramifications of fan-submitted content. If a writer is even slightly similar to these ideas, they risk facing lawsuits that could damage their professional reputation and financial stability.

For instance, Lackey noted:

"If I even remotely think our ideas are similar, I can and likely would sue them for copyright infringement."

Alternative Paths to Success

A more viable and beneficial approach for aspiring writers is to focus on developing their own original scripts. By creating unique and original content, writers can build a portfolio of work that showcases their talents and creativity. Once this foundation is established, writers can seek representation from literary agents or production companies who can help market and sell their scripts to the industry.

The journey from fan-fiction to a successful professional writing career is entirely possible, but it requires careful navigation of legal and ethical boundaries. Writers can learn from the experiences of those like Lackey and appreciate the value of promoting originality and avoiding potential legal pitfalls.

Ultimately, the key to success in the writing industry lies in building a reputation for originality, professionalism, and ethical behavior. Fan-fiction can serve as a stepping stone for creativity, but it should not be the foundation upon which one builds a professional career.

Conclusion

The evaluation of fan-fiction by writers' black lists is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of legal, ethical, and professional implications. Writers should focus on developing their own unique stories and seeking proper representation to ensure a successful and fair career in the writing industry.

By avoiding the risks associated with fan-fiction, writers can build a solid reputation and achieve success on their own terms. The path to success may be challenging, but it is much more rewarding to revel in the fruits of your own original work.