Is Excessive Force Being Used by Riot Police in Hong Kong?

The question of whether riot police in Hong Kong are using excessive force has been a contentious issue. This article aims to provide a balanced and detailed analysis of the cases that have been brought to light, examining the effectiveness and ethical considerations of the methods employed by the Hong Kong police force.

Use of Live Rounds

In two notable incidents, the use of live pistol rounds by the police raises questions about the degree of force required. In separate cases, the police could have potentially resolved the conflict with less lethal methods. For example, in one instance, a downward angle of

Water Cannon and Tear Gas

The municipality's use of water cannon and tear gas grenades also invites scrutiny. In the mosque incident, the purpose seemed to be more about clearing barriers rather than forceful confrontation. The blue dye used with the water cannon is highly controversial, as it essentially leaves no lasting effect and burden to the municipal crews.

Regarding tear gas grenades, while some have modified them for incendiary effects, there appears to be a fine line between their use as riot control agents and as live ammunition. The potential for these grenades to cause widespread damage should be carefully considered.

Allegations of Rape and Violence

There have been serious allegations of violence and, notably, claims of rape in police custody. Dr. X, a prominent lawyer, is currently working on this case, which suggests there may be some substance to the claims. If these allegations are fabricated, pursuing such cases carries significant professional risk, further corroborating the seriousness of these claims.

Critical Reflection on Police Tactics

It is often argued that police tactics are intentionally provocative, designed to incite a violent response from protesters. However, taking a realistic and empathetic view, the police are in heavily armored and well-armed positions, significantly outmatched by less equipped civilians. Cloth items referred to as 'bricks' can be equally or even more dangerous than the weapons confiscated from rioters.

In this context, it is argued that the rioters are ill-equipped civilians, while the police, protected in body armor, gas masks, and helmets, are heavily armed. Tear gas was used only as a defensive measure in response to attacks from rioters, such as during today's incident where corrosive liquids and petrol bombs were used. The police are not seeking to engage in a confrontation, whereas the rioters are.

Conclusion

The issue of excessive force used by riot police in Hong Kong is complex and multifaceted. Both sides have valid arguments, and addressing this issue requires a detailed and thorough examination. Whether the force used can be deemed excessive depends largely on the circumstances and methods employed by both the police and the rioters.