FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Insights into Elephant Without Borders and the Status of Donations

January 25, 2025Film2567
Exploring the Donation Status of Elephant Without Borders and the Role

Exploring the Donation Status of Elephant Without Borders and the Role of PR

Following the news in March 2020, there has been considerable speculation about the whereabouts of a donation that was supposed to be made to Elephant Without Borders (EWB) by revenue from a specific production associated with Meghan Markle's PR team. While nearly six months have elapsed since the initial announcement, the public and media continue to inquire as to why the donation has not materialized as anticipated.

Insights on the Potential Payment

The elephant in the room regarding the funding of EWB is whether the donation was indeed received by the charity organization. It is worth noting that EWB has already listed Disney as one of its donors. This inclusion indicates that there is at least a degree of trust between the two entities. However, no public denial of the receipt has been issued by EWB, leaving the situation fluid and subject to diverse interpretations.

Verbal Contract and Legal Implications

One of the key points of contention involves the alleged verbal contract between EWB and the PR team. Should the contract fail to materialize, and the funds not be delivered, it raises the question of whether a legal case could be pursued. It is widely known that similar issues have led to legal disputes in the past. For example, if the payment was not made, Meghan Markle likely would have sought legal action. Given that the film has now been released and Disney is making substantial income from the production, it’s logical to question why action has not been taken.

Speculation on Legal Challenges

Given the high-profile nature of the situation, some individuals may speculate that Disney, known for its aggressive legal tactics, has chosen not to chase a legal remedy because they feel confident in their standing. Additionally, it’s worth considering the impact of an anonymous inquiry. While it may garner attention and curiosity, it could also distract from the more substantive questions surrounding the donation and its execution.

Conclusion

In summary, the lack of a definitive statement from EWB regarding the status of the donation following the initial PR announcement provides ample ground for speculation. While there is a high likelihood that the funds were received, the silence from EWB and the absence of legal action by Markle might suggest a more strategic delay or a lack of urgency from either party. Nonetheless, the ongoing inquiry into the status of the donation remains a pertinent issue, and continued transparency from all involved would be beneficial.