FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Game of Thrones: Characters Killed for Plot Convenience

January 25, 2025Film2926
Game of Thrones: Characters Killed for Plot Convenience Game of Throne

Game of Thrones: Characters Killed for Plot Convenience

Game of Thrones, known for its intricate storyline and dramatic plot twists, often relies on character deaths to advance the narrative. However, some viewers argue that certain deaths are unnecessary and cringe-worthy, serving only to prop up the plot. This article delves into characters killed off for no apparent reason, and the controversial nature of these plot-driven character deaths.

Plot-Driven Decisions in Game of Thrones

In Game of Thrones, character deaths are a crucial element of the narrative. They serve to advance the plot, resolve conflicts, and foreshadow future events. From the Stark family to the Targaryens, every death likely had a purpose to drive the story forward. Yet, some deaths stand out as purely plot-driven, lacking in substance and impact.

The Bald Guy and Ser Barristan the Bold

One of the most controversial character deaths was that of the bald guy, also known as Ser Barristan the Bold. His death was seen by many as unnecessary and poorly executed. The actor, Jason Momoa, played the character in the last two seasons. Ser Barristan was left to protect Grey Worm, the leader of the DOthraki, at the siege of Meereen. His sacrifice was seen as a waste, with his death offering no significant plot development. Another controversial death is that of Ser Barristan himself. In contrast with Ser Barristan, Jojen Reed's death was largely seen as a convenience to the plot. Jojen was critical in Bran's journey but had become a subplot in the books. In the TV series, the character's death served as a distraction from the core narrative.

Unnecessary Deaths and Their Impact

Several other deaths in the series were criticized for being too convenient and lacking in substance. For example, the deaths of Mycah and many others like him were merely to convey the brutality of the world. These deaths serve more as a purposeless commentary rather than a pivotal plot point.

Hasan al-Hazrza, Aerys II, and Theon Greyjoy

The character of Hasan Al-Hazrza, who was a figure in the Sons of the Harpy storyline, was killed off in a manner that many viewers felt trivialized the narrative. Another example is Aerys II, the Mad King, whose death was necessary to establish control over the city by Robert Baratheon. Similarly, Theon Greyjoy's death was often harshly criticized, overshadowing his contributions to the story.

The Case Against Unnecessary Deaths

While many argue that all character deaths in Game of Thrones have a purpose, some critics believe that unnecessary deaths detract from the quality of the storytelling. These deaths can leave a bitter taste in the viewer's mouth, suggesting that the writers only killed off characters when convenience suited their plot, rather than when a character's death provided genuine progress to the story.

Conclusion

Game of Thrones is a complex and layered show, with many deaths serving critical narrative purposes. However, there are deaths that can be criticized as plot-driven and unnecessary. It is essential that while the show prioritizes its storyline, it does not sacrifice the emotional depth and character development that make Game of Thrones so intricate and engaging.

Keywords: Game of Thrones, character death, plot twist, Thrones plot