Exploring Preferences: Is It Bad to Like Killmonger More Than T'Challa?

Is it bad that you liked Killmonger more than T'Challa? When it comes to liking a character in a story, there is no right or wrong answer. Your personal preference can vary widely and is shaped by individual perspectives and personal experiences.

Killmonger (portrayed by Michael B. Jordan in Black Panther) is a complex character with a compelling backstory that resonates with many viewers. His motivations, rooted in personal trauma and a desire for justice, evoke a sense of sympathy and understanding. This makes him a memorable antagonist whose complexity adds layers to the narrative. On the other hand, T'Challa represents ideals of responsibility, leadership, and heritage which some viewers may find admirable.

Complex Characters

Both characters represent different aspects of heroism and leadership. Killmonger’s story is fraught with personal tragedy, and his actions are driven by a deep, heartfelt desire for change. He is not just a simple villain; his character arc offers a multifaceted view of human nature and the complexities of justice and freedom. This dynamic makes him a compelling figure in the story.

Why Do We Relate to Killmonger?

Many viewers find themselves connecting with Killmonger’s emotional journey more than T'Challa’s. The series “What If…” further emphasizes the potential of Killmonger as a powerful and iconic character. Although his narrative arc is cut short, his presence leaves a lasting impact due to the depth of his character and the audience’s understanding of his motivations.

Some argue that Killmonger’s character added a layer of anti-hero potential to the film. He stands as a figure who could have potentially brought positive change but was ultimately too flawed and misguided to succeed. This complexity makes him a richer and more nuanced character than a traditional villain.

Personal Connection and Compassion

It is not inherently bad to prefer Killmonger over T'Challa. Your preference might reflect your connection to the themes and conflicts presented in the film. Appreciating the depth of both characters, even if you find yourself drawn more to one than the other, is perfectly valid.

Despite the sympathetic qualities of Killmonger, it is essential to recognize that his methods may not be justifiable. While it is acceptable to feel anger and frustration towards the injustices he experiences, prioritizing such anger over respect for human life is problematic. This is the essence of why he failed as a hero—his methods were not aligned with the values of justice and compassion.

If you find yourself more in favor of Killmonger and those preferences extend to glorifying his actions, it might be a sign that deeper reflection is needed. It is crucial to acknowledge that even in fiction, the actions of a character can have real-world implications. Being mindful of our choices in character preference can help us navigate complex ethical discussions.