Dogfight Betweeen F-35 Lightning II and Sukhoi Su-35: An Impossible Scenario

In the realm of military aviation, the specter of combat between advanced fighters such as the F-35 Lightning II and the Sukhoi Su-35 is fascinating. However, the likelihood of such an engagement is almost nil. This article explores the potential dynamics and outcomes of a hypothetical dogfight, scrutinizing the technological advancements and piloting skills required.

Theoretical Engagement Scenarios

While a face-to-face dogfight between the F-35 and Su-35 may seem thrilling, practical realities make it improbable. Modern fighter jets are designed to engage in beyond-visual-range (BVR) combat using advanced air-to-air missiles. The Su-35 is historically known for its maneuverability, while the F-35 emphasizes stealth and multifunctionality.

Beyond-Visual-Range (BVR) Dominance

Beyond-visual-range BVR engagements are the new standard in air combat. Whoever spots the other first is often doomed. For instance, an upgraded F-35 can carry multiple AMRAAMs or AIM-9X missiles internally, presenting a formidable challenge to the Su-35. This internal missile carriage adds significant lethality to the F-35.

Assuming a Close Dogfight

Let’s imagine a hypothetical scenario where the F-35 somehow engages an Su-35 in a close-range dogfight. The F-35 is not designed as a traditional dogfighter, and its maneuverability could be limiting. However, its advanced avionics, sensor systems, and infrared signature reduction would give it an edge in low-speed maneuvers. The F-35 can angle itself at high angles of attack, making it incredibly versatile in combat.

The Su-35’s Kinematic Advantages

The Su-35, an excellent one-circle fighter, excels in low-speed maneuvers. Its PESA radar is significantly outmatched by the F-35’s AN/APG-81 AESA radar. Even with the F-35’s Barracuda electronic warfare systems, the Su-35 would need to get very close to gain a lock-on, negating its kinematic advantages. The F-35’s IR signature reduction means the Su-35 must engage at close range.

Quality of Pilots

The skill of the pilots is crucial. US, British, or European pilots flying the F-35 are likely to be superior in training and experience compared to Russian pilots. This superior training and experience would likely tip the balance in favor of the F-35, even if the aircraft itself were to be outmatched. The ability to quickly process information, make decisions, and execute maneuvers efficiently is often the determining factor.

Conclusion

While the F-35 and Su-35 represent some of the most advanced fighter jets, a hypothetical dogfight between these aircraft is highly unlikely. The F-35’s BVR capabilities and superior avionics make it a superior BVR combatant. However, in a close dogfight, the F-35’s versatility and the Su-35’s kinematic advantages could result in a more unpredictable outcome. Nonetheless, without the right conditions and highly skilled pilots, such a scenario remains purely theoretical.

Key Takeaways

Understanding the nuances of modern air combat highlights the critical role of technology and piloting skills. The F-35’s internal missile carriage and superior avionics give it an edge in BVR engagements. The Su-35’s kinematic advantages would be negated in a physical dogfight due to the F-35’s advanced technology. Pilot training plays a crucial role in air combat.

While these hypothetical discussions are engaging, the current reality is dominated by BVR engagements and high-tech intercepts, showcasing the remarkable evolution of military aviation.