FilmFunhouse

Location:HOME > Film > content

Film

Does the Big Bang Theory Make Sense to You?

March 01, 2025Film2359
Does the Big Bang Theory Make Sense to You? The Big Bang theory, as pr

Does the Big Bang Theory Make Sense to You?

The Big Bang theory, as proposed by supporters of cosmic evolution, seems to be in direct contradiction with the established theories and laws of science. It is crucial to understand the underlying principles that challenge the notion of an uncaused and continuous expansion of the universe. This discussion will delve into the scientific facts that support the contention that cosmic evolution is not only unscientific but impossible based on fundamental laws of physics.

Time, Space, and Energy/Matter as a Continuum

The Big Bang theory assumes that time, space, and energy/matter have been in a constant and uncaused state of expansion and evolution. However, this assumption cannot hold without several fundamental principles of physics being ignored or misinterpreted.

Time, space, and energy/matter are fundamentally intertwined in a continuum; they cannot exist independently of each other. As William Wallace, a renowned philosopher and physicist, noted: 'Since without SPACE you can't have MATTER and without MATTER you can't have TIME. This fact is often overlooked by evolutionists.'

The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics

The First Law of Thermodynamics, also known as the Law of Conservation of Energy, states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This implies that all energy in the universe must have an originating cause. If this is the case, the Big Bang cannot be a spontaneous process, as it would require the creation of energy from nothing, which violates the First Law.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics, often referred to as the Law of Entropy, states that the total entropy (disorder) of an isolated system cannot decrease over time. If disorder always increases with time, how can evolution accounts evade this fundamental principle of thermodynamics? The laws of thermodynamics clearly indicate that life cannot arise from non-life spontaneously; hence the notion of evolution from a primordial soup is scientifically impossible.

The Role of Information and Mutations

Understanding the nature of information is critical. Potential information, as contained in the laws of physics, cannot arise from nothing, nor can it be lost or destroyed. Mutations, seen by evolutionists as a driving force behind evolution, are essentially a scrambling or loss of information. They do not add any new information to the genome, thus eliminating the possibility of macro-evolution, a cornerstone of the theory of evolution.

From a scientific perspective, mutations are not the source of the complexity and adaptation seen in life forms. Instead, they are more often viewed as distortions or errors that can sometimes result in beneficial traits or, more frequently, harmful effects.

Newtons Third Law and the Laws of Physics

Newtons Third Law, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction, underpins the principle of cause and effect. It asserts that every effect must have a prior cause. Applying this principle to the concepts of time, space, and matter, we see that without the cause of energy, there can be no effect of motion, which is essential for the computation of time, or the expansion of space, or the existence of matter.

If we consider the universe, the existence of time, space, and matter all require a prior cause. Without the cause of energy (i.e., an intelligent mind or a first cause), there can be no effect of information or physical laws. Nature, as we see it, is the effect, not the cause. Therefore, there must be a first cause responsible for bringing the effects of nature into existence.

A Theological Perspective

The necessity to explain the existence of energy demands the eternal existence of God. The proposition that the universe created itself out of nothing is a contradiction of the fundamental principles of physics. Instead, the second alternative—that the universe was created by a Creator—is the more coherent explanation supported by logical and scientific analysis.

Evolutionists often fabricate theories to mitigate the truth, ignoring the eternal existence of God. They often refuse to accept the Laws of Science and Physics, opting for fictional narratives instead of real scientific principles. Understanding and accepting the laws of thermodynamics, as well as the Continuum of Time, Space, and Energy, is crucial in comprehending why cosmic evolution is both unscientific and implausible.

Therefore, while the Big Bang theory and its supporters may present complex and fascinating ideas, a thorough examination reveals that these ideas are based on an incomplete or incorrect interpretation of fundamental scientific principles. As such, the Big Bang theory and cosmic evolution cannot be considered scientific explanations for the origins and development of the universe.