Do Cancel Culture Deserve a Place in the Ages of Political Expression?

The recent backlash faced by Kalani Hilliker and Kendall Vertes from Dance Moms for supporting Donald Trump in the 2020 election highlights the broader issue of cancel culture and its impact on individuals’ personal and political expressions. While critics argue that individuals should face consequences for their actions, others believe that cancel culture fosters a hostile and intolerant environment, stifling free speech. This article explores the concepts of cancel culture and the implications it has on public perception and societal values through the lens of the controversial cases of Kalani and Kendall.

The Case of Kalani Hilliker and Kendall Vertes

Kalani Hilliker and Kendall Vertes, contestants from the popular reality TV show Dance Moms, found themselves at the center of a heated debate when they supported Donald Trump during the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. The public response was immediate and severe, with many supporters of the opposing political party demanding that the girls be “canceled.” This incident raises important questions about the scope and application of cancel culture in contemporary society.

Understanding Cancel Culture

Cancel culture refers to the social practice of publicly condemning and boycotting individuals or entities for their controversial or unethical actions, especially on social media. Critics argue that the practice of canceling can be more effective than legal penalties, as individuals can face significant social and economic consequences. However, the question remains whether such practices uphold democratic values of free speech and individual rights.

The Impact of Cancel Culture on Public Perception

The case of Kalani and Kendall illustrates the rapid and intense nature of cancel culture. Social media platforms allowed their supporters to quickly mobilize and demand that the girls be held accountable for their political stance. This phenomenon emphasizes the immediacy with which opinions and actions can be judged and condemned in the digital age. However, it also raises concerns about the consequences of a hostile and intolerant public atmosphere, which can result in disproportionate and unfair treatment of individuals.

The Broader Context of Free Speech in the United States

The United States, long known for its constitutional protection of free speech, has seen a shift in how this right is exercised and enforced. The irony lies in the fact that cancel culture often undermines the spirit of free speech by silencing individuals through the threat of public condemnation. In democratic societies, the ability to express dissenting opinions without fear of retribution is crucial for a robust and pluralistic discourse.

Revisiting Kalani and Kendall’s Experience

While Kalani and Kendall faced significant backlash for their political support, it is important to note that both ultimately rejoined Dance Moms and continued with their careers. Despite the immediate outrage and demands to deny them any form of media platform, their eventual return underscores the complex nature of public opinion and the uncertain consequences of cancel culture.

Conclusion

Calani Hilliker and Kendall Vertes from Dance Moms exemplify the heightened scrutiny and potential for public backlash in an era dominated by cancel culture. The immediate and severe response to their political stance raises critical questions about the duality of free speech and the risks associated with cancel culture. As society continues to grapple with these issues, it is essential to reflect on the balance between holding individuals accountable and preserving the democratic values of free expression and tolerance.

Keywords: cancel culture, political beliefs, Dance Moms