Defending Movies from Censorship: A Modern Perspective

Censorship, by definition, involves a government or regulatory body preventing a movie from being shown, often due to concerns over controversial content. This practice has a long history, but contemporary challenges and perspectives offer valuable insights. In this article, we explore some notable examples of movies that have faced censorship, the role of film critics, and the evolution of the film regulatory landscape.

Historical Context of Film Censorship

During the 1970s, the UK faced a difficult period for filmmakers, with controversial mainstream films being reviewed and censored by the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC). This board often acted as a moral guardian, intervening in ways that some argue were excessive. Classic films such as The Exorcist, A Clockwork Orange, and The Devils were subject to strict scrutiny and often limited distribution.

Similarly, Hollywood faced its own set of challenges. The impact of censorship on movies like A Clockwork Orange, Straw Dogs, and Basic Instinct is well-documented, highlighting the power of the BBFC and similar bodies in shaping public opinion and limiting artistic expression.

Artistic Freedom and Union Support

As of recent years, the landscape has evolved. In the United States, artists and filmmakers generally have more freedom to create and distribute their work without significant censorship. However, some recent cases have resurfaced, with movies facing protests and censorship attempts. For example, Dogma, directed by Kevin Smith, was protested, although the action was more focused on entertainment and less about serious censorship concerns.

Support for artists comes from various quarters, including film critics and unions. Film critics often play a crucial role in shaping public discourse and defending controversial content. They may champion films like Citizen Kane, which challenged societal norms and faced criticism during its release.

Personal Experiences and Cultural Impact

A personal story can provide a vivid illustration of the impact of censorship. In the case of The Life of Brian, a Monty Python film about a man mistakenly identified as Jesus Christ, viewers were met with protesters outside the movie theater. Significantly, these protesters were motivated by their religious beliefs and saw the film as an affront to their faith. The film critic and the theater staff protected the integrity of the work, ensuring it was shown freely.

During a visit to the movie theater, a vigilant critic approached me, attempting to dissuade me from watching the film. He claimed that I would go to hell if I purchased a ticket. My ethical stance was clear; I asked him if he had actually seen the film, which naturally he hadn't. His argument was based on assumptions and fear-mongering rather than genuine understanding or engagement with the content.

Conclusion

The role of censorship in the film industry continues to evolve. While it remains a contentious issue, modern regulations and the greater freedom of expression offer a more open environment for filmmakers. Defenders of artistic freedom, including film critics and union representatives, play a significant role in advocating for the rights of filmmakers to express their creativity without undue interference. As these issues continue to arise, it is essential to support and protect the right to uncensored artistic expression.