Debunking the Biggest Scientific Plot Holes in Popular Movies

Introduction to Scientific Realism in Science Fiction and TV

As a child of a scientist, I’ve been frequently exposed to the intricacies of scientific reasoning, and one thing that often frustrates me about popular movies and TV shows is their treatment of atmospheric pathogens. It is reassuring to know that the air in space or on new planets is breathable. What about the pathogens we’ve never encountered? Shouldn’t there be at least some mention of biosecurity protocols to avoid introducing unknown microorganisms? This issue is common in science fiction films and TV series, with minimal justification and often no mention at all. Scientists and stricter adherence to scientific principles are necessary to maintain the integrity of these narratives.

The Role of Believability in Science Fiction

Popular movies and TV shows that rely heavily on science often ask viewers to suspend their disbelief in order to accept the storyline. This is especially apparent in contemporary science fiction, as our understanding of science has advanced significantly since the time of authors like H.G. Wells. Modern audiences are more critical and expect a higher level of scientific accuracy, which can dampen the magical and fantastical elements that are often celebrated in science fiction. While there is value in using scientific terms like 'Quantum' for added scientific respectability, sometimes this approach stretches the limits of believability.

Common Plot Holes in Media

One of my pet peeves is the overuse of bootstrap paradoxes. These paradoxes can be interesting plot devices, but they are often used gratuitously without adding significant depth or, worse, without understanding their logical implications. When bootstrap paradoxes are poorly conceived, they can undermine the scientific realism of a narrative.

Physical Realism in Science Fiction

When it comes to the physical mechanics of space travel and other scientific phenomena, popular media often glosses over or simplifies the physics for the sake of entertainment. For instance, consider the acceleration to near-light speeds in spacecraft. While the crew casually walks around, they are defying the laws of inertia. Similarly, the sudden transition out of hyperdrive without any indication of the kinetic energy or physical effects experienced would be unscientific and impractical.

Real-World Examples and Backlogs in Police Dramas

In television and film, the portrayal of investigative procedures often falls short when compared to real-world conditions. For example, in reality, forensic and investigative procedures in places like Georgia have extensive backlogs, leading to delays in case resolution. While these backlogs are sad and frustrating, they serve as a stark reminder that the portrayal of such procedures in entertainment often overlooks the complexities and delays that are part of real-life investigations.

It is crucial for creators of science fiction and science-based dramas to be more mindful of these scientific realties, as it can significantly enhance the credibility and enjoyment of their work. By incorporating realistic scientific elements, these narratives can engage audiences on a deeper level and foster a greater appreciation for the scientific principles that shape our understanding of the world.