Introduction

One of the most controversial plot points in Star Trek: Discovery is the explanation and handling of the aftermath of 'The Burn.' This article critiques the storyline and examines potential alternate narratives, while also addressing the broader issues of representation and justice.

Challenges in The Burn Explanation

The narrative of the show attempts to address the catastrophic event known as 'The Burn' through a simplistic 'little boy screamed and half the galaxy died' explanation. This narrative falls flat both from a storytelling perspective and in terms of scientific plausibility. The plotline stretches credibility and comes across as a cheap shock value plot device to manipulate the audience into sympathizing with seemingly extreme actions.

Questioning the Writer's Intentions

The writers of Star Trek: Discovery seem to be more focused on drawing an emotional response from the audience rather than delivering a coherent plot. Their attempt to justify the murder on a galactic scale for the sake of a child's scream highlights a fundamental lack of understanding about the complexities of storytelling and the importance of logical consistency.

Implications for Su’kal

The incident involving Su’kal raises more questions than it answers. How can an adolescent with the capability to cause widespread destruction be responsibly integrated into society? Even characters like Charlie X, with ostensibly lesser powers, faced significant challenges in navigating human society. The show suggests that no human or humanoid in the Star Trek universe has such abilities, and there are stringent controls in place for those who do possess similar powers.

Comparative Analysis

Many characters with significant abilities in the Star Trek franchise are either kept under strict observation or are bound by personal codes, societal laws, or parental constraints. These elements are essential for maintaining order and ensuring that extraordinary abilities do not pose a threat to the well-being of the galaxy. Without such controls, the existence of a figure like Su’kal poses a significant risk to galactic peace and stability.

Potential Legal Framework

Some might argue that Su’kal should be punished for his actions, which brings to light the issue of how justice is administered in the Star Trek universe. However, it is essential to consider the complex legal and moral frameworks that govern such decisions. Real-world precedents in dealing with individuals with psychological disorders can offer valuable insights into how to approach such situations.

Autistic Representation and Federal Justice

Compared to how real-world institutions often handle cases involving people with autism, the Federal Bureau in Star Trek: Discovery displayed a remarkable amount of cultural sensitivity and compassion. They recognized the need to understand and accommodate the unique circumstances of Su’kal. This is commendable, as real-world societal laws and responses to individuals with autism often lack the same level of nuanced understanding.

Conclusion

To close, the handling of 'The Burn' and Su’kal in Star Trek: Discovery requires a more thoughtful and nuanced approach. While the creation of a new explanation for the incident is appealing, it is equally important to understand the broader implications for how such extraordinary beings are integrated into society and governed. A better balance between emotional cutoff and rational analysis would serve the franchise well.

Final Thoughts

The ongoing narrative of Star Trek: Discovery should strive to provide a more comprehensive and believable explanation for the events surrounding 'The Burn.' This would not only enhance the show's credibility but also offer valuable insights into the complex issues of justice, responsibility, and the integration of beings with extraordinary abilities into a society.