Debating the 2020 TIME Person of the Year: A Controversial Choice

.Editor's Note: The question of whether Joe Biden and Kamala Harris should be declared Persons of the Year by TIME is a subject of intense debate. Opinions on their current and past actions vary widely, highlighting the varying standards and values in their respective communities.

Old School Military Brat's Perspective

From my experienced perspective, as an elder who has seen change through multiple educational institutions, the constants have always been deeply personal - family honor and a strong religious background. These values are notably absent in Joe Biden. Even the Catholic bishops struggle to commingle communion with him. When they tarnish their family, they leave them in harm's way. Hitler, Pol Pot, and Hussein didn't come close to the depths of betrayal and endangerment of their families. The reactions of dark forces are clearly delighted at his actions. May God keep our family safe, despite Biden.

Agreeing with the Choice

In defense of the TIME selection, to be named 'Persons of the Year' underscores their significant presence in the news cycle and the impact they have had, which is not always positive. Biden and Harris have indeed done a lot in their short time in office, taking decisive steps leading to major changes. They inherited a terrible state of affairs and are addressing critical issues such as health, the economy, and social justice. Without their governance, the fault lines of these issues may have become even more prevalent.

The importance of their work should not be taken lightly. Through their actions, the nation has been rehabilitated, resuming its rightful place as the greatest in the world. They have been pivotal in putting the country back on the global map, and their governance has been crucial in these trying times.

Disagreeing with the Choice

On the other hand, many disagree with the selection, citing the lack of significant accomplishments. While their jobs are to govern, they have made numerous errors and failed to exceed their job descriptions. They are not the only individuals who have made significant contributions to society. There are countless scientists, doctors, and researchers who have dedicated their time to curing diseases such as COVID-19 and cancer, not to mention advancements in climate science and engineering. These individuals are far more deserving of recognition.

Moreover, their performance in office has been criticized for basic incompetence. Reading from a teleprompter without errors is not something a person in their position should struggle with. Their failures in office and the everyday chaos they have brought to government are undeniable factors that contribute to their controversial ranking.

As we reflect on these contrasting perspectives, it is clear that the designation of Person of the Year is as much a political and subjective choice as it is a factual one. The interpretations of what constitutes significant contribution to the state often vary widely among different communities and individuals, indicating the diverse and multifaceted nature of modern governance and global leadership.

Conclusion

The debate over Joe Biden and Kamala Harris being named the Person of the Year by TIME reflects the complex realities of modern politics and the impact of leadership on the nation. Whether one agrees or disagrees, this choice serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing ideology, governance, and human values in our collective pursuit of progress and stability.