Comparing the Arrogance of Sherlock Holmes in Original and Adapted Works

Introduction

The character of Sherlock Holmes, originally created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, often portrays a complex blend of arrogance and humility. This article delves into how these traits are explored in the original stories and contrasts them with the portrayal in the BBC adaptation. Through an in-depth examination, we aim to understand the nuances of Holmes' character and the differences between the two versions.

Arrogance in the Original Stories

In the original Sherlock Holmes stories, Holmes' intelligence and deductive skills often result in a confident and superior attitude. However, his arrogance is balanced by moments of warmth, compassion, and a strong sense of justice. For instance, in the story 'The Boscombe Valley Mystery', Holmes is known to dismiss Scotland Yard Inspector Lestrade with a comment that Lestrade is unskilled at handling facts and labels him as an 'imbecile'. Despite such instances, Holmes also shows empathy and a commitment to justice, particularly in his interactions with Dr. John Watson.

Arrogance in the BBC Adaptation

The BBC adaptation of Sherlock has been criticized for its heavy emphasis on Holmes' arrogance and eccentricity. In this version, Sherlock is portrayed as more aloof and dismissive towards those he deems less intelligent. This portrayal is starkly different from the original stories, where Holmes' arrogance is partially balanced by his compassionate and just nature.

Balancing Act: Holmes in Original Stories

While both versions share elements of arrogance, the original stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle offer a more complex portrayal of Holmes. Across his adventures, Holmes demonstrates moments of humility and warmth. One such instance is seen in Watson's observations and the strong bond between them. For example, in the novel Sherlock Holmes and the Strange Death of Brigadier-General Delves, Holmes is portrayed as a crucial witness in a murder trial, showcasing his best qualities. This stands in contrast to the more polarized portrayal in the BBC series.

Watson's Role and Holmes' Development

The portrayal of Dr. John Watson in the original stories also differs significantly from the series. Watson is given a more significant and active role in the plots, often making critical decisions and taking courageous actions. In the original tales, Watson is not merely a passive biographer but an integral part of the narrative, supporting Holmes and contributing to their cases.

Conclusion

While both versions capture certain aspects of Sherlock Holmes' personality, the original stories provide a more nuanced and balanced portrayal of the character. The original works show a complex individual with periods of arrogance but with the ability to show compassion, justice, and moments of vulnerability. The BBC adaptation, on the other hand, leans more heavily on the exaggerated side of his personality, missing out on the depth and depth of his character.

As writers continue to explore Holmes' character, it is important to understand and appreciate the original stories to fully capture the essence of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's creation. By doing so, future adaptations can better resonate with fans while also offering new insights into the enigmatic and multifaceted character of Sherlock Holmes.