Cinderella: Comparing Disney's Adaptations with Original Fairy Tales

Cinderella, one of the most beloved fairy tales of all time, has been adapted and reimagined countless times across various media. While Disney's animated version has become the most widely recognized, it draws significantly from Charles Perrault's 1697 version and other earlier tales. This essay delves into the differences between various versions, the lessons we can learn from them, and personal preferences.

Charles Perrault's Version

Charles Perrault's original version of the fairy tale, titled "Cendrillon ou la petite pantoufle de verre" (Cinderella or the Little Glass Slipper), was first published in 1697. Perrault's story is a dramatically less Disney-fied version, filled with subtle nuances and complex characters. Unlike the sparkling, colorful depiction in Disney's animated film, Perrault's version emphasizes the moral lessons and the kind-hearted nature of Cinderella over her looks. The story does not mention Cinderella's beauty, but rather focuses on her kindness and how she maintains her goodness despite her harsh treatment by her stepmother and stepsisters.

The father in Perrault's version does not die but does not actively participate in the story. His role is diminished, and the focus shifts from a loving father to a more distant figure. Instead of a fairy godmother, Perrault introduces a fascinating concept: the stepmother and stepsisters also ask for forgiveness and ultimately live happily ever after, highlighting the theme of forgiveness and redemption.

The Brothers Grimm's Adaptation

In contrast, the Brothers Grimm's version, titled "Aschenputtel" or 'The Ash Fool,' is far more grim and haunting. This version transforms Cinderella into Aschenputtel (Ashfool), with a more sinister and cruel stepmother and stepsisters. The stepmother, in this version, is both physically and psychologically abusive, and the sister's treatment of Aschenputtel is even more despicable. The start of the story mentions that Aschenputtel is given the task of picking lentils from the ashes of the hearth, and the success of the task is promised to allow her to attend the king's ball. However, the stepmother reneges on this promise, demonstrating her deceitfulness.

The Brothers Grimm's tale introduces a "wishing tree" and a white bird to replace the fairy godmother, providing a unique twist that aligns more with a magical realist style rather than traditional fantasy. The metaphorical use of the tree and bird bulbs the concept of wish fulfillment, but without the magical intervention of a fairy godmother. In this adaptation, the reward for fulfilling the task is not just attending the ball, but also opportunities to gain magical aid.

The twist in the shoe fitting scene is particularly graphic and disturbing. Instead of the simple cut and no-blood version in Disney, the stepsisters mutilate their feet to try and fit the golden slipper. In a later edition, the dove characters, who helped Aschenputtel, peck out the stepsisters' eyes as a form of punishment. The moral complexity here is harrowing and seldom seen in today's children's literature or media.

Lessons from Each Version

Charles Perrault's version of Cinderella emphasizes emotional and moral growth. It teaches the value of kindness, forgiveness, and redemption, showing that no matter how bad the situation, it's possible to overcome tragedy and find happiness. Perault's creation of a character who faces cruelty but remains unfailingly good, reflects the belief in the inherent goodness of people in overcoming adversity.

The Brothers Grimm's version, on the other hand, delves into darker themes such as revenge, cruelty, and the consequences of one's actions. It provides a stark contrast to the more sanitized version in Disney, highlighting the consequences of cruelty and deceit. This version can serve as a powerful moral lesson, though it may be too intense for younger audiences.

Personal Preferences and Why I Prefer Perrault's Version

While both versions have their unique merits, I prefer Charles Perrault's story. The romanticization and the focus on character growth make the story more relatable and inspiring. Perrault's version presents a more human and flawed character, showing that the power of forgiveness can triumph over injustice. The absence of the magical elements makes the story feel more grounded, focusing on the inner strength of the characters.

Disney's adaptation, while visually stunning, sometimes glosses over the darker themes and moral complexities. The sanitization may be necessary for a younger audience but can make the story feel less real and more like a fantasy. Perrault's version, though older, retains the emotional depth and moral lessons that make the story truly timeless.