Can the F-35 Outmaneuver the Su-27 in a Dogfight? An Analysis of Stealth and Beyond Visual Range Combat

When discussing aerial combat between the F-35 Lightning II and the Su-27 Flanker, one must carefully consider the strategic and tactical nuances that define modern air operations. The question often shrinks down to a close-range dogfight, but that assumption misses the primary design philosophy of the F-35—resistance through stealth and long-range engagement.

The F-35’s Stealth and BVR Capabilities

The F-35 Lightning II is primarily designed for stealth and beyond visual range (BVR) combat. Its radar-evading features, coupled with its advanced electronic warfare systems, are engineered to avoid detection and engage targets at a safe distance. The entire F-35 project hinges on the idea that close-range dogfights, where aircraft are within visual range and engaging with visual detection systems, are outdated concepts from previous eras of aviation warfare.

Close-Range Combat Considerations

In a close-range (beyond visual range (BVR) drops to 2:1) aerial combat (WVR), the outcome becomes less certain. The Flanker’s advantage lies in its tremendous maneuverability and advanced radar systems. However, if the F-35 were to engage in such a scenario, the game changes significantly. The Su-27 will not even know where the incoming missiles come from due to the F-35's stealth capabilities and first-thing-first shoot technology.

Redefining Air Combat with the Su-27

The Su-27 Flanker is a formidable aircraft, but it is from the era when the ability to close the distance quickly and engage in close combat was paramount. However, modern fighter aircraft like the F-35 are designed to avoid these close-range engagements. The old adage, "You don't get into a close dogfight with a Flanker," still holds true. This is especially critical because, as the article states, the F-35's primary design feature is avoiding detection and engaging from a distance.

Comparing Older and Modern Aircraft

It's interesting to compare the Su-27 to the Su-57 (necessary as both are Russian aircraft), especially considering that both are older systems in comparison to the latest 5th Generation fighters. In a realistic dogfight scenario where all factors, including piloting skills and technological superiority, are considered, the F-35 would have significant advantages.

If a dogfight does occur, the Su-27 may have a slight edge due to its superior maneuverability and older systems. However, it's important to note that the F-35's advanced systems and pilot training put it in an advantageous position even in such a scenario. Nonetheless, the fundamental design philosophy of the F-35 is to prevent such encounters through stealth and long-range engagement.

As the article concludes, the main feature of the F-35 is its ability to maintain a BVR engagement with a superior kill ratio. This philosophy aligns with the overall strategy of modern air forces—focusing on first-engage, first-shoot and utilizing stealth technology to avoid engagement in the first place.

Final Thoughts

The debate between the F-35 and the Su-27 is not just about aircraft capabilities but also about operational strategies. The ability to avoid close-range engagements through stealth and BVR capabilities is a significant factor that tilts the balance in favor of the F-35. While close-range combat is a real possibility, the primary design intent and expected operational scenarios underscore the F-35's superior positioning.

It's crucial for both military planners and enthusiasts to understand the strategic implications of these design philosophies to appreciate the full scope of modern air combat.