British Perspectives on the 2016 Film 'London Has Fallen'

The 2016 film London Has Fallen received a mixed reception from British audiences, particularly in terms of its plot, character development, and overall entertainment value. This article presents British viewpoints on the film, emphasizing the concerns and criticisms that arose from viewer reviews and discussions.

Evaluating 'London Has Fallen': Plot and Setting

One of the primary criticisms of the film lies in its plot and setting. A notable British viewer, for instance, commented: ldquo;The film is bad from the start and it takes patience on your part to continue watching it. The plot does not make any logical sense, especially the part where the helicopter picks up the President and the hero, and flies away to an unspecified location.rdquo; This viewer further elaborated: ldquo;If you have the slightest clue about London, trying to place the flight routes is utterly impossible. The scenes go back and forth across the city, repeating the same landmarks, and the journey to the destination takes far too long.rdquo;

Comparing to Other Film Genres

When juxtaposed with movies like Airplane! or the Die Hard series, London Has Fallen is often seen as inferior. One British critic noted: ldquo;The film is overlong and not that funny. While spoofs like Airplane! are generally more entertaining and better executed, the Die Hard series offers a more witty approach with better acting, special effects, and plots. Additionally, these films are not only action-filled but also manage to spoof themselves, which adds to their appeal.rdquo;

Characterization and Realism

The characters and their actions in the film have also been questioned by British viewers. A viewer with intimate knowledge of the Metropolitan Police stated: ldquo;The filmrsquo;s depiction of several hundred Met Police officers being replaced by mercenaries or terrorists is just too far-fetched. It is also amusing to ponder that this could never happen in the UK, considering the differences in law enforcement and national security measures.rdquo; Another viewer highlighted: ldquo;The action genre can be extremely enjoyable, but this film falls into the category of mindless gore for the sake of it. While films like Seven Samurai or The Dirty Dozen offer a more thoughtful and moody alternative, London Has Fallen leans towards over-the-top violence without much substance.rdquo;

British Audience Fallout

Despite its numerous criticisms, some British viewers found the film passable. One viewer, who generally avoids action films, offered a mixed review: ldquo;If you enjoy an action film where you are not required to think, then itrsquo;s okay. However, at 133 minutes, it feels like a marathon with several minutes passing without any laughs, making it sometimes feel like it would be taken seriously in certain parts.rdquo;

Conclusion

While London Has Fallen may have captured the imagination of some viewers, it predominantly received negative feedback from British audiences. The film’s excessive action sequences, questionable plot elements, and lack of intelligent humor failed to impress, suggesting that a balance between entertainment and realism is essential for a successful action film. In conclusion, while it might be worth watching for a light-hearted experience, it is advisable to proceed with caution and to consider the source of such critiques as part of the overall viewing experience.