What are Common Cliches You See in Zombie Apocalypse Stories That You Wish People Would Stop Writing?

Zombie apocalypse stories have become a popular genre, but they often rely on certain clichés that can feel overused and predictable. Here are some of the most common ones that many readers and viewers wish would be avoided:

The Incompetent Authority Figures

Government officials or military leaders are often portrayed as completely inept, leading to chaos. This can feel unrealistic and tired. Instead, consider focusing on the unique strengths and weaknesses of different leaders to create more dynamic and complex roles.

The Lone Survivor or Hero

A single character emerges as the sole survivor or hero, often with special skills or a backstory that makes them uniquely suited to survive. While this can make for a compelling protagonist, it can detract from the ensemble dynamic. Embrace the team effort and show how each character's strengths contribute to their survival.

Love Triangles

Romantic entanglements amidst chaos can feel forced, especially when they overshadow survival elements and character development. Focus on building stronger, more believable relationships that enhance the story rather than detract from it.

The Group That Falls Apart

While conflict within survivor groups is realistic, the trope of a group constantly betraying or abandoning one another can become repetitive. Instead, explore the internal struggles and resolve of the group to add depth and emotional weight to the story.

Zombies as Mindless Monsters

The portrayal of zombies as completely mindless creatures lacks nuance. Exploring their past lives or emotions could add depth and create more engaging characters. This approach not only enriches the narrative but also shows the inherent humanity within the undead.

Overly Predictable Endings

Many stories follow a formulaic path, where the survivors either find a safe haven or are tragically wiped out. This can lead to a lack of surprise and interest. Instead, innovate and create endings that are both satisfying and unexpected. This can make the story feel fresh and engaging.

Excessive Violence for Shock Value

While violence is often a part of the genre, focusing solely on gore without character development can feel gratuitous. Develop your characters in a way that makes their actions meaningful, and use violence as a tool to convey deeper themes rather than just for shock.

The Final Stand

A small group making a final stand against overwhelming odds is a common trope. To avoid cliché, infuse this scenario with fresh ideas and unexpected twists. Explore the psychology of the characters and their reasons for holding out, rather than just playing out a standard battle scene.

The Unlikely Survivalist

Characters with no survival skills suddenly becoming experts in combat, foraging, or medicine can stretch credibility. Instead, build your characters' skills through the story, making their transformations believable and more engaging. This approach allows for more nuanced character development and adds to the overall realism of the narrative.

The Quest for a Cure or Vaccine

The quest for a cure or vaccine can feel like a convenient way to wrap up the story. This undermines the themes of survival and human resilience. Instead, focus on the everyday struggles and triumphs of the characters, and let the story evolve organically rather than relying on a plot device.

By moving away from these clichés and exploring more nuanced characters and scenarios, zombie apocalypse stories can feel fresh and engaging. Keep in mind that while the genre is meant to be bleak, it should not be bleak to the point that the audience stops caring. Ensure that there are good reasons to root for the characters and maintain a connection to the story's emotional core.