Authority and Punishment: Ned Starks Decision to Ute Gared

Introduction

In the realm of A Song of Ice and Fire by George R.R. Martin, the decision by Ned Stark to ute Gared as a deserter from the Night's Watch is both a significant legal action and a statement of values. This article will delve into the authority and reasons behind Ned Stark's decision, as well as historical precedence and the impact on theme and character development.

Authority of Ned Stark

Ned Stark, as Warden of the North and Lord of Winterfell, wields considerable authority. His role as the appointed liege lord by King Robert grants him the responsibility to maintain law and order in the North, ensuring that the laws and customs of Westeros are upheld. Uting, a form of capital punishment, is recognized as a legal form of execution for those who commit grave offenses such as desertion, murder, or similar crimes punishable by death.

The Case of Gared

Upon discovering Gared's desertion, Ned Stark's decision to ute Gared is rooted in his unwavering commitment to justice and the defense of the North. The Desertion of the Night’s Watch is a severe offense, as it reflects on the unity and reliability of the organization responsible for defending the realm against threats. Gared's desertion during a period when the White Walkers were seen represents a breach of trust that could undermine the safety of the realm.

Historical Precedent: The Seventy-Nine Sentinels

Before Ned Stark's decision, there is a well-documented case of desertion in the realm, known as the Seventy-Nine Sentinels. In this story, seventy-nine men from the Nightfort chose to desert their posts and ride south. The most poignant example is that of Lord Ryswell's son, who pleaded for shelter but was ultimately turned in by his father. The father’s decision to hand over his son to the authorities reflects a deep understanding of the gravity of desertion and the consequences it carries.

Charles Vonnegut's Perspective

Commentators have long debated the rationality and morality of Ned Stark's decision. One such perspective comes from Charles Vonnegut, who argues:

"Well, that's stupid. Gared should get his head chopped off by a White Walker. Ned, ute him? DUHH!!!"

Vonnegut’s viewpoint emphasizes the harsh reality of the threat posed by the White Walkers. However, Ned Stark's decision also underscores the theme of honor and justice fundamentally inherent in his character. He is bound by his duty to the North and his broader loyalty to the realm, which sometimes necessitates making difficult and controversial choices.

Legal and Ethical Implications

Ned Stark's authority to ute deserters like Gared is not without controversy. While it is true that desertion is punishable by death, the lack of trial or appeals process raises ethical questions. The execution of Gared is a final, irrevocable consequence of his actions, and no form of leniency or consideration is extended to him. This emphasizes the severity of desertion and the necessity of upholding the laws that protect the realm.

Conclusion

The decision by Ned Stark to ute Gared is a pivotal moment in the narrative, serving to highlight the themes of honor, justice, and the responsibilities of leadership. It underscores the stark choices that must be made in the face of adversity and the moral ambiguities that arise from protecting a realm from external threats. Through this action, Ned Stark’s character is further defined, and the reader is reminded of the complex and often morally challenging decisions that define the characters in A Song of Ice and Fire.