Anti-Gun Advocates: How Do They Defend Themselves?

r r

With the ongoing debates surrounding gun control, many people are curious to know how those advocating for stricter regulations defend themselves. While the answer can vary greatly depending on individual circumstances, this article explores different perspectives and approaches to self-defense among anti-gun advocates.

r r

Traditional Approaches to Self-Defense

r r

For many, the idea of defending themselves without a firearm seems daunting. Traditionally, the first response would be to call the police, a common and logical step. However, as one proponent suggests, relying on police intervention alone may not be sufficient, especially in situations where help may not arrive in time:

r r

r

My guess is to call the police and hope they arrive before the victim dies.

r

r r

Other commonly suggested methods include reciting lies, hurling insults, and attempting physically to subdue an attacker with limited success. For example, one person mentioned that:

r r

r

Recite lies about gun control, hurl insults, scream, try to cancel the individual/animal attacking them and possibly risk breaking a nail trying to slap the individual/animal attacking them. And when all else fails, throw a massive foot stomping hissy fit. Maybe the poor individual/animal will take pity upon you.

r

r r

Self-Defense Strategies for Gun Control Advocates

r r

Given the prevalence of firearms in some societies, particularly the United States, many anti-gun advocates might consider investing in alternative forms of self-defense. Gun control proponents may prefer smaller, less potent firearms to minimize the risk of injury to themselves or others. As one advocate suggests:

r r

r

I am a strong proponent of strong gun regulations. As for how I would defend myself, I prefer a semi-automatic subcompact .380, something like the Ruger LCP Max I carry. The recoil from anything in a larger caliber will likely hurt my arthritic hands. I’m well over 70 years old.

r

r r

Another perspective is to invest in non-lethal self-defense techniques like martial arts. Learning skills such as kung fu can be an effective way to defend oneself, especially against an unarmed attacker. As one suggests:

r r

r

Learn kung fu. If your attacker is unarmed, you could win. If your attacker is armed, you have a less likely chance of winning unless your kung fu is really good.

r

r r

The Role of the Police

r r

When it comes to the involvement of law enforcement, the expectations and scenarios can vary. Some believe that the police may only arrive after the situation has escalated. As one person noted:

r r

r

The police show up after it's over and draw chalkies around them.

r

r r

Others, however, suggest that calling the police might be a last resort, with self-preservation being the primary concern. In such cases, the quickest and safest option might be to comply and potentially avoid further harm.

r r

Conclusion

r r

The methods for self-defense among anti-gun advocates vary widely, from traditional approaches like calling the police to more modern techniques like learning martial arts. What is clear is that the debate over gun control and self-defense is complex, and every individual must consider their own circumstances and preferences.

r r

Remember, the best way to defend yourself can depend on your particular situation, your age, your health, and your proficiency with different self-defense techniques. Whether you choose to rely on law enforcement, carry a firearm, or master a martial art, the key is to be prepared and knowledgeable about the best methods for your unique situation.

r