An Insight into the Nuances of Love and Misogyny in 'A Consent to Marry'

Just finished watching A Consent to Marry, and I can't help but delve into a detailed review of the movie. Rating it a solid 3.8 out of 5, I was under the impression that Rajkumar Rao and Bhumi Pednekar would touch on basic homosexual relationships. However, the film goes beyond the surface and delves into nuanced aspects of relationship dynamics that the mainstream audience may not be fully aware of.

Plot Overview and Character Dynamics

The plot follows Shardul Thakur, a gay police officer, and Sumi Singh, a lesbian Physical Education teacher, as they enter into a fabricated marriage to appease their families who are pushing them into heterosexual marriages. It is easy to assume that these characters would become best friends, like the popular Hollywood trope suggests. However, A Consent to Marry explores an intense and conflicting relationship between two people whose identities are far from simple.

Deepening the Relationship

The film showcases how Shardul and Sumi, despite their sexual orientations, have different backgrounds and lives, making a close relationship challenging to maintain. Their shared sexual orientation does not mean they are alike; it binds them in a unique way but also creates tension and distance.

Subplots and Themes

A Consent to Marry also tackles broader themes, such as misogyny. Contrary to popular belief, the film reveals that gay men are not immune to misogyny, a shocking realization brought to light by the character of Shardul. Despite being gay and closeted, Shardul treats Sumi as an inferior and often mistreats her. This theme acts as a critique of societal and familial expectations.

Additional Subplots

The movie also explores the subplots of catfishing, where bisexual or lesbian women are deceived by men who seek physical or financial gain. Moreover, it highlights the challenges in closeted relationships, where the closeted individuals often cannot openly voice their feelings until they are ready to come out.

Well-Planned and Beautifully Executed

One of the strengths of the film is the way it develops the relationship between Shardul and Sumi. Initially acquaintance, they develop a friendship that matures into a deep and personal connection, driven by mutual respect and understanding. The film ingeniously avoids simplistic messages of social change, instead focusing on personal and interpersonal growth.

Criticism and Conclusion

While the film excels in many areas, there are a couple of flaws that stand out. The abrupt progression of the plot, especially the one-year gap between Shardul and Sumi's declaration and the wedding ceremony, feels rushed. Adding a more gradual build-up would have enhanced the storytelling. Additionally, the suggestion that Sumi should have dated Shardul to understand him better is an interesting point worth exploring.

Overall Rating and Recommendation

Considering all the above, I would still recommend this film. Rajkumar Rao's acting is top-notch, and Bhumi Pednekar's subtlety is incredibly powerful. The film is worth watching for both longtime fans of the director and newcomers to his work who appreciate thought-provoking and nuanced storytelling.

Do you think it's worth the watch? I believe the answer can only come from your own experience and reaction to the film, but if you enjoy cinema that challenges the norm and explores complex relationships, this is a film you should not miss.

Lastly, I must add that all of Rajkumar Rao's movies are definitely worth the watch. It's a testament to his talent and unique storytelling that each one stands out in its own right.

Related Keywords

gay relationships misogyny in cinema relationship dynamics