Introduction

Is Lex Luthor's bomb in Batman vs. Superman truly an 'idiotic' plot device or a necessary ingredient to move the story forward? This article delves into the intricacies of the bomb placed in the wheelchair of Wallace Keefe to kill Senator June Finch and its subsequent explosions that destroy the U.S Capitol building. We will examine the plausibility of the bomb in comparison to Superman's capabilities and scrutinize the consistency of the plot in this film.

Plot Device Analysis

The crux of this discussion revolves around Lex Luthor's decision to plant a bomb in Wallace Keefe's wheelchair and the outcome that ensues. A key concern is whether the bomb was justified in the context of the film's narrative and the portrayal of Superman.

Lex Luthor's Motive and the Bomb

Lex Luthor is portrayed as a cunning and manipulative character. His primary goal is to bring down Superman, the symbol of hope in the DC universe. By targeting Wallace Keefe, a trusted ally of Superman, and using a bomb to incapacitate or kill him, Luthor creates a scenario that forces Superman into a difficult and morally challenging decision. This decision, in turn, is crucial for the plot's advancement. Therefore, the bomb serves as a pivotal element in the storyline.

Superman's Inability to Notice the Bomb

The narrative's credibility is tested when Superman, despite his extraordinary powers, does not detect the presence of the bomb in Keefe's wheelchair. This raises questions about the consistency of his character and the logic of the plot. Superman, known for his heightened senses and awareness, would logically have noticed such a significant anomaly. That he did not implies a degree of narrative disbelief injected into the story.

Sense of Senses and Superman's Perception

Superman's key attributes include highly acute senses, heightened awareness, and a preternatural ability to detect threats. In the movie, it is essential to explore whether these attributes were compromised in this particular scene. If not, the lack of detection can only be explained by a deliberate choice to create conflict and tension, possibly for dramatic effect.

Superman's Responsiveness to External Calls

The film is also marred by inconsistency in Superman's responsiveness to external calls for help. For instance, Lois Lane, the primary journalist covering the Superman story, is in danger from a distance, yet Superman does not respond immediately. This raises yet another level of skepticism about the believability of the plot.

Superman's Neglect of Immediate Threats

The lack of awareness towards Superman's mother, who is in a dire situation, also undermines the suspension of disbelief. Given his strong emotional connection to his biological mother, one would have expected a more immediate response.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

While Batman vs. Superman is a significant entry in the DC cinematic universe, the implementation of Lex Luthor's bomb and Superman's non-detection of the same serve as critical plot elements that can either enhance the narrative or undermine its credibility. The film's success hinges on maintaining a balance between drama and pragmatism, ensuring that each character's actions align with their established traits.

Ultimately, the bomb and itsaftermath pose significant challenges to the narrative's integrity. Addressing these inconsistencies through clearer exposition or an adjusted storyline could have strengthened the film's overall impact. As with any superhero film, the audience's ability to suspend disbelief is crucial, and any flaws in this regard can detract from the overall experience.

For fans of the genre, a deeper exploration of these plot inconsistencies can lead to a richer understanding of what makes a compelling superhero story and how to improve upon it.