A Critical Analysis of Money Heist's Ending: Unexplained and Unrealistic

Introduction

Many fans of Money Heist found the show's ending to be underwhelming and confusing. The show, known for its intricate heist plots and engaging character arcs, was left to an end that many felt was not adequately explained. In this analysis, we will break down several points that contributed to the perceived lack of logic and realism in Money Heist's culmination.

H2: The Cry for Logic and Realism

One of the primary criticisms of Money Heist's ending is the absence of logic. Especially in the final five episodes, the story seemed to lose its coherence. Some fans used the phrase "unrealistic flawed and ridiculous ending" to describe the show's finale. Here are six main points that contributed to this feeling:

H3: Emotional and Logical Discrepancies

Point 1: The Cry and Mourning of Tokyo
The show ended with a suicide bombing orchestrated by Tokyo, killing six soldiers. This tragic event led to intense mourning, yet, in this fictional context, the characters and the audience are left questioning the reactions. Speculating on this, one fan asked if the people in the fictional world would actually support a suicide bomber who had killed soldiers. They stressed that Tokyo, a known killer, had violated the manifesto's non-murder clause, yet the team still mourned her. This begged the question of respect for soldiers and adherence to what was initially a no-murder rule.

H3: Emotionally Misplaced Moments

Point 2: The LOVE Triangle and Emotional Misalignment
Near the end of the final arc, characters like Denver, Manila, and Stockholm engaged in a love triangle. Considering the gravity of the situation, where Tokyo had just died, the characters' reactions and subsequent actions (like making out) seemed disconnected. Fans pointed out that this was a weak point in character development and plot cohesion. This moment marked a clear disconnect in emotional alignment, further damaging the show's sense of realism and logic.

H3: Unnecessary Risk and Immaturity

Point 3: The Baby in Hostile Territory
Quite controversially, the show portrayed the team bringing their baby into highly dangerous situations. Given the imminent risks of their heist and the importance of the baby's safety, this decision rendered the overall plan nonsensical. It also highlighted a lack of maturity in the characters' decisions, making the team's actions appear incoherent and thoughtless.

H3: Unfulfilled Subplots and Story Clarity

Point 4: The Berlins' Subplot
The Berlin and Tatiana subplot had potential but fell flat at the end of the series. The characters' actions in the resolution of this subplot did not add value to the main storyline. This sub-arc was seen as a time filler rather than a meaningful component of the overall narrative, rendering it a null point.

H3: Character Development and Moral Dilemmas

Point 5: Raquel Murilho's Character Growth
Raquel's character development was a significant criticism. She fell deeply in love with the Professor very quickly, abandoning her sense of principle and her former identity. A former police officer, Raquel now found herself emotionally and morally paralyzed. Her decision to fall for the Professor without due consideration was a major failing in character consistency and showed a deterioration in her moral compass.

H3: The Plan That Failed

Point 6: The Insert Valuable Gold into the Deposit Plan
The overall plan, called "PLAN TOM THUMB," was deemed inadequate. The sequence of events in which the team first stole the gold, returned it, and then went through a series of increasingly risky maneuvers to reinsert the gold was fraught with holes. The plan heavily depended on the assumption that the Spanish government would leave the robbers free, but this was a logical non sequitur. The government's decision to use gold as a reserve in times of need made the plan illogical, and the reasoning behind allowing the robbers to proceed without repercussion was incomprehensible.

Conclusion

Money Heist, with its engaging heist plots and deep character development, faced a letdown in its conclusion. The final episodes failed to provide a satisfying resolution. The issues raised by fans, ranging from emotional disconnection to illogical plot points, indicate a significant gap in the show's ability to deliver a coherent narrative and emotional closure for its audience. Future filmmakers and scriptwriters would benefit from learning from these shortcomings to ensure that their series or films offer a more coherent and realistic ending.

Overall, the perceived ending of Money Heist is a case study in the importance of maintaining logical and emotional consistency in storytelling. A satisfying conclusion is not just about resolving subplots; it's about ensuring that the entire narrative arc remains coherent and true to the characters and the world they inhabit.

Keywords

Money Heist ending, heist story ending, critics of Money Heist